2005
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2005.a1394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging technologies in oilfield applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the η Eu value is on the increase. So this value is assumed to be an indication of the degree of asymmetry in the surroundings of Eu 3+ , and can also be ascribed to the relatively homogeneous distribution of the complex in gel [10], which appears to be responsible for the fewer emission lines of Eu 3+ in silica gel doped with Eu(sal) 3 (phen) than those in the pure complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the η Eu value is on the increase. So this value is assumed to be an indication of the degree of asymmetry in the surroundings of Eu 3+ , and can also be ascribed to the relatively homogeneous distribution of the complex in gel [10], which appears to be responsible for the fewer emission lines of Eu 3+ in silica gel doped with Eu(sal) 3 (phen) than those in the pure complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, multiphase flow imaging and measuring in an oil well is harder. Some initial technologies have been just developed until now both at home and abroad [13][14][15][16][17] . The DEFT (digital entry and fluid imager tool) of Schlumberger Company has eight probes placed on the centralizer radially around the wellbore, each probe makes a digital measurement to distinguish oil, gas and water according to the electro conductivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%