Over a period of 5 years, an isolated light chain (kappa = 9, lambda = 12) was detected in 21 sera by immunofixation electrophoresis. Further analysis with anti-delta- and anti-epsilon-specific antisera identified four delta heavy chains, all associated with a lambda light chain, and no epsilon heavy chains. For evaluation of the role of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) in the diagnosis of IgD paraproteins, as a possible alternative or complement to immunofixation, IgD paraproteins were retrospectively analyzed by 2D-PAGE. Delta Heavy chains migrated to gel areas clearly distinguishable from other heavy chains alpha, gamma, or mu, and in a wide range of isoelectric points (pI: 5.4-8). In one serum, the monoclonal delta chain had a pI range comparable to that of albumin and was undetectable. However, all four delta chains were easily identified when analyzed from affinity-purified immunoglobulin fractions. These observations showed the following: 1) IgD paraproteins are not rare among apparently isolated monoclonal light chains detected by routine immunofixation, strongly confirming the need for further analysis with anti-delta antisera, before assumption of a light-chain disease. 2) 2D-PAGE analysis of affinity-purified immunoglobulin fractions allowed correct identification of IgD monoclonal gammopathies in all cases. 3) However, although 2D-PAGE analysis is now easy to perform, well standardized, and highly sensitive, this technique remains time-consuming and expensive, and does not appear suitable for routine practice as a first-line diagnostic procedure. 2D-PAGE should find its place as a complement to immunofixation and in the definitive demonstration, in selected ambiguous cases, of the clonal pattern of a suspected gammopathy at immunofixation.
A total of 360 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis were randomized in a placebo-controlled, dose-finding study comparing three concentrations (0.06%, 0.125%, and 0.25%) of a cetirizine nasal spray, administered three times a day for 2 weeks. The primary criterion of efficacy was the percentage of days with no or only mild symptoms of rhinitis (PDMax1), as evaluated by the patients. The median PDMax1 were 16.7%, 30.8%, 42.9%, and 26.7% for the placebo, 0.06%, 0.125%, and 0.25% groups, respectively. Although the global comparison among the four groups only approached statistical significance (P = 0.076), the difference (26.2%) between the placebo and 0.125% groups was clinically and statistically significant (P = 0.011). For the global evaluation by the investigator, the best results were seen in the 0.125% group (P = 0.03). The occurrence of adverse events did not differ among the four treatment groups and consisted mainly of nasal events, occurring in 22.5%, 17.1%, 12.9%, and 24.4% of the patients for the placebo, 0.06%, 0.125%, and 0.25% groups, respectively (P = 0.184). These results indicate that the 0.125% concentration is significantly better than placebo and offers the best therapeutic ratio.
Little is known about referral patterns to the allergist for hay fever. In a system with open access to the specialist, we investigated the reasons for consulting an allergist in 126 patients who completed a questionnaire on their first visit. Both sexes were equally represented, the median age was 29 years, the duration of the disease and the duration of seasonal symptoms were 9 years and 10 weeks (median), respectively, and 54% of patients reported a history suggestive of asthma. The symptoms were highly variable; on average, 5.6 on a 10-cm visual analog scale. Most of the patients (94%) had been treated for hay fever before. Only 30% were referred by another physician, the rest being self-referred. The reasons for referral were investigated. The overall motivation to consult was related to symptom severity in 63% of the patients; 37% consulted for other reasons, including an expectation of greater "know-how" on the part of the allergist concerning specific diagnosis, treatment, and advice or counseling. The stimulus triggering the consultation was clearly not related to symptoms or disease in 25% of the cases. We conclude from these data that many patients are clearly interested in benefiting from the professional skill of a fully trained allergist.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.