Objective: To assess rates of and factors associated with traversing fundamental barriers to good medical outcomes and pharmacologic care in individuals with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM), including socioeconomic status and race.Background: Barriers to good outcomes in migraine include the lack of appropriate medical consultation, failure to receive an accurate diagnosis, not being offered a regimen with acute and preventive pharmacologic treatments (if indicated), and not avoiding medication overuse. Methods: The Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study was a longitudinal Internet-based survey. Respondents who met criteria for migraine consistent with the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, had a Migraine Disability Assessment score ≥ 6, and provided health insurance coverage status were included in this analysis. Successfully traversing each barrier to care and the effects of sociodemographic characteristics were examined. Results: Among 16,789 respondents with migraine, 9184 (54.7%; EM: 7930; CM: 1254) were eligible. Current headache consultation was reported by 27.6% (2187/7930) of EM and 40.8% (512/1254) of CM respondents. Among consulters, 75.7% (1655/2187) with EM and 32.8% (168/512) with CM were accurately diagnosed. Among diagnosed consulters, 59.9% (992/1655) with EM and 54.2% (91/168) with CM reported minimally appropriate acute and preventive pharmacologic treatment. Among diagnosed and treated consulters, in the EM group 31.8% (315/992) and in the CM group 74.7% (68/91) met medication overuse criteria. Only 8.5% (677/7930) of EM and 1.8% (23/1254) of CM respondents traversed all four barriers. Higher income was positively associated with likelihood of traversing each barrier. Blacks and/orAfrican Americans had higher rates of consultation than other racial groups. Blacks and/or African Americans and multiracial people had higher rates of acute medication overuse.
We conclude that in healthy elderly subjects undergoing THR, the flexibility of the analgesic regimen is more important than the route of administration with regard to efficacy, adverse effects and recovery of cognitive function.
Background
We examined the efficacy and tolerability of calcitonin gene-related peptide targeted monoclonal antibodies (CGRP-targeted mAbs) as add-on therapy for patients with chronic migraine (CM) undergoing treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA(onabot) who require additional preventive therapy.
Methods
We reviewed medical records of patients with CM receiving treatment with onabot who were subsequently prescribed a CGRP-targeted mAb medication. The primary outcome was the change in number of monthly headache days (MHDs) reported. Secondary outcomes were change in headache pain severity, discontinuation due to lack of tolerability, and severe adverse events.
Results
Of 153 patients, 111 (72.5%) reported a decrease in either MHDs or headache pain severity, with documentation of MHDs in 66 patients. Of these 66 patients, average MHDs prior to initiating onabot treatment was 25.7. After onabot treatment, an average decrease of 10.9 MHDs was reported (p < 0.001). After the addition of a CGRP-targeted mAb medication, patients experienced a further decrease of 5.7 MHDs (p < 0.001). With combined therapy, patients reported a total decrease of 16.6 MHDs (p < 0.001). Adverse effects occurred in 13 patients (8.5%) after addition of the CGRP-targeted mAb and included constipation, injection site reaction, and/or fatigue. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion
Adding a CGRP-targeted mAb to onabot in patients with CM was associated with further reductions in MHDs without major tolerability issues across a range of mAbs. This retrospective review supports the conduct of a well-designed double-blind study adding a CGRP-targeted mAb or placebo to onabot.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.