Objectives In 2011, the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, within the Health Resources and Services Administration, awarded a 4-year grant to increase access to and assure the delivery of quality oral health preventive and restorative services to children. The grant was awarded to organizations serving high-need communities through school-based health centers (SBHCs). This article describes an independent evaluation investigating program efficacy, integration, and sustainability. Methods Program process and outcomes data were gathered from interim and final reports. Interviews with key informants were conducted by phone, and analyzed in NVivo qualitative software. Results Students had great need for comprehensive services: on average, 45% had dental caries at enrollment. Enrollment increased from 5000 to more than 9700, and the percent receiving preventive services increased from 58 to 88%. Results of the analytically weighted linear regression show statistically significant increases in the proportion of enrollees who had their teeth cleaned in the past year (t(4) = 5.19, β = 8.85, p < 0.05) and those receiving overall preventive services (t(4) = 13.52, β = 10.93, p < 0.01). Grantees integrated into existing programs using clear, consistent, and open communication. Grantees sustained the full suite of services beyond the grant period by increasing billing and insurance claims while still offering free and reduced-cost services to those uninsured or otherwise unable to pay. Conclusions for Practice This project demonstrates that access to comprehensive oral health care for children can be expanded through SBHCs. State Title V Block Grant and other similar federal initiatives can learn from the strategic approaches used to overcome challenges in the school-based environment.

Introduction Pharmacy patient experience within military treatment facilities (MTFs) is a significant indicator of healthcare quality, as hospital admissions correlate with medication use (Budnitz et al., 2006) and pharmacists have a unique opportunity to influence patients’ health (Dalton & Byrne, 2017). To improve patient care across the military health system (MHS), we investigated best practices within MTF pharmacies with the highest patient experience scores. Materials and Methods Researchers performed semi-structured telephone interviews with pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and patient experience officers from three of the highest ranked MTF pharmacies according to outpatient satisfaction survey results to glean “best practice” approaches to patient care. Researchers utilized the Gioia approach as a guiding theory for qualitative analysis of the interview data, and the study was excluded from a requirement to obtain institutional review board approval due to the number of respondents in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 guidelines. Results Interview participants from highly rated pharmacies emphasized the importance of communication among and between staff and patients, staff engagement and morale, and supportive leadership at their facilities for creating a positive patient experience and clinical environment. Conclusion These findings provide valuable insights to improve public health in military-connected populations through improved patient care practices in pharmacies across the MHS. Initiatives aimed at improving health care for pharmacy patients should prioritize improved communication and structural support for team members to create patient-friendly environments, which enables pharmacists and technicians to connect with patients and positively impact health outcomes. Limitations include lack of comparison data for lower performing pharmacies; future research will explore practices at lower ranking pharmacies to provide insights into communication practices, environments, and staff relationships impacting patient experience scores as well as the role patient demographics (e.g., retirees vs. active duty) and characteristics including facility size play in potential improvements.