The thiazolidinediones represent a new class of insulin sensitizing agents for the treatment of Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. The original drug in this class, troglitazone, has been shown to ameliorate insulin resistance and improve glycaemic control and dyslipidaemia in Type II diabetic patients [1±6]. However, all previous studies which employed the insulin clamp technique to examine the effect of troglitazone on insulin sensitivity employed pharmacologic insulin infusion rates (80±300 mU/m 2 min) that produced supraphysiologic plasma insulin con- Results. After 12 weeks, rosiglitazone reduced fasting plasma glucose (195 11 to 150 7 mg/dl, p < 0.01), mean plasma glucose (PG) during OGTT (293 12 to 236 9 mg/dl, p < 0.01), and HbA 1 c (8.7 0.4 to 7.4 0.3 %, p < 0.01) without changes in plasma insulin concentration. Basal endogenous glucose production (EGP) declined (3.3 0.1 to 2.9 0.1 mg/kg FFM´min, p < 0.05) and whole body glucose metabolic clearance rate increased after rosiglitazone (first clamp step: 2.8 0.2 to 3.5 0.2 ml/kg FFM´min, p < 0.01; second clamp step: 6.7 0.6 to 9.2 0.8, p < 0.05) despite increased body weight (86 4 to 90 4 kg, p < 0.01) and fat mass (33 3 to 37 3 kg, p < 0.01). Fasting plasma non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) (735 52 to 579 49 mEq/l, p < 0.01), mean plasma NEFA during OGTT (561 33 to 424 35, p < 0.01), and basal NEFA turnover (18.3 1.5 to 15.5 1.2 mEq/kg FM´min, p < 0.05) decreased after rosiglitazone. Changes in EPG and mean plasma glucose (PG) during OGTT correlated with changes in basal EGP (r = 0.54; r = 0.58), first EGP (r = 0.36; r = 0.41), first MCR (r = ±0.66; r = ±0.68), second MCR (r = ±0.49; r = ±0.54), fasting plasma NEFA (r = 0.53; r = 0.49), and NEFA during OGTT (r = 0.66; r = 0.66). Conclusion/interpretation. Rosiglitazone increases hepatic and peripheral (muscle) tissue insulin sensitivity and reduces NEFA turnover despite increased total body fat mass. These results suggest that the beneficial effects of rosiglitazone on glycaemic control are mediated, in part, by the drug's effect on NEFA metabolism. [Diabetologia (2001) 44: 2210±2219]Keywords Type II diabetes mellitus, rosiglitazone, glucose and non-esterified fatty acid metabolism, insulin sensitivity.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by a progressive failure of pancreatic β-cell function (BCF) with insulin resistance. Once insulin over-secretion can no longer compensate for the degree of insulin resistance, hyperglycemia becomes clinically significant and deterioration of residual β-cell reserve accelerates. This pathophysiology has important therapeutic implications. Ideally, therapy should address the underlying pathology and should be started early along the spectrum of decreasing glucose tolerance in order to prevent or slow β-cell failure and reverse insulin resistance. The development of an optimal treatment strategy for each patient requires accurate diagnostic tools for evaluating the underlying state of glucose tolerance. This review focuses on the most widely used methods for measuring BCF within the context of insulin resistance and includes examples of their use in prediabetes and T2DM, with an emphasis on the most recent therapeutic options (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists). Methods of BCF measurement include the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA); oral glucose tolerance tests, intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTT), and meal tolerance tests; and the hyperglycemic clamp procedure. To provide a meaningful evaluation of BCF, it is necessary to interpret all observations within the context of insulin resistance. Therefore, this review also discusses methods utilized to quantitate insulin-dependent glucose metabolism, such as the IVGTT and the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp procedures. In addition, an example is presented of a mathematical modeling approach that can use data from BCF measurements to develop a better understanding of BCF behavior and the overall status of glucose tolerance.

Aim To test our hypothesis that initiating therapy with a combination of agents known to improve insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in subjects with new-onset diabetes would produce greater, more durable reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, while avoiding hypoglycaemia and weight gain, compared with sequential addition of agents that lower plasma glucose but do not correct established pathophysiological abnormalities. Methods Drug-naïve, recently diagnosed subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were randomized in an open-fashion design in a single-centre study to metformin/pioglitazone/exenatide (triple therapy; n = 106) or an escalating dose of metformin followed by sequential addition of sulfonylurea and glargine insulin (conventional therapy; n = 115) to maintain HbA1c levels at <6.5% for 2 years. Results Participants receiving triple therapy experienced a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c level than those receiving conventional therapy (5.95 vs. 6.50%; p < 0.001). Despite lower HbA1c values, participants receiving triple therapy experienced a 7.5-fold lower rate of hypoglycaemia compared with participants receiving conventional therapy. Participants receiving triple therapy experienced a mean weight loss of 1.2 kg versus a mean weight gain of 4.1 kg (p < 0.01) in those receiving conventional therapy. Conclusion The results of this exploratory study show that combination therapy with metformin/pioglitazone/exenatide in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM is more effective and results in fewer hypoglycaemic events than sequential add-on therapy with metformin, sulfonylurea and then basal insulin.

We examined the relationship between peripheral/hepatic insulin sensitivity and abdominal superficial/deep subcutaneous fat (SSF/DSF) and intra-abdominal visceral fat (VF) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Sixty-two T2DM patients (36 males and 26 females, age = 55 +/- 3 yr, body mass index = 30 +/- 1 kg/m2) underwent a two-step euglycemic insulin clamp (40 and 160 mU. m(-2). min(-1)) with [3-3H]glucose. SSF, DSF, and VF areas were quantitated with magnetic resonance imaging at the L(4-5) level. Basal endogenous glucose production (EGP), hepatic insulin resistance index (basal EGP x FPI), and total glucose disposal (TGD) during the first and second insulin clamp steps were similar in male and female subjects. VF (159 +/- 9 vs. 143 +/- 9 cm2) and DSF (199 +/- 14 vs. 200 +/- 15 cm(2)) were not different in male and female subjects. SSF (104 +/- 8 vs. 223 +/- 15 cm2) was greater (P < 0.0001) in female vs. male subjects despite similar body mass index (31 +/- 1 vs. 30 +/- 1 kg/m2) and total body fat mass (31 +/- 2 vs. 33 +/- 2 kg). In male T2DM, TGD during the first insulin clamp step (1st TGD) correlated inversely with VF (r = -0.45, P < 0.01), DSF (r = -0.46, P < 0.01), and SSF (r = -0.39, P < 0.05). In males, VF (r = 0.37, P < 0.05), DSF (r = 0.49, P < 0.01), and SSF (r = 0.33, P < 0.05) were correlated positively with hepatic insulin resistance. In females, the first TGD (r = -0.45, P < 0.05) and hepatic insulin resistance (r = 0.49, P < 0.05) correlated with VF but not with DSF, SSF, or total subcutaneous fat area. We conclude that visceral adiposity is associated with both peripheral and hepatic insulin resistance, independent of gender, in T2DM. In male but not female T2DM, deep subcutaneous adipose tissue also is associated with peripheral and hepatic insulin resistance.

We examined the contributions of insulin secretion, glucagon suppression, splanchnic and peripheral glucose metabolism, and delayed gastric emptying to the attenuation of postprandial hyperglycemia during intravenous exenatide administration. Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes (3 F/9 M, 44 +/- 2 yr, BMI 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, Hb A(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.5%) participated in three meal-tolerance tests performed with double tracer technique (iv [3-3H]glucose and oral [1-14C]glucose): 1) iv saline (CON), 2) iv exenatide (EXE), and 3) iv exenatide plus glucagon (E+G). Acetaminophen was given with the mixed meal (75 g glucose, 25 g fat, 20 g protein) to monitor gastric emptying. Plasma glucose, insulin, glucagon, acetaminophen concentrations and glucose specific activities were measured for 6 h post meal. Post-meal hyperglycemia was markedly reduced (P < 0.01) in EXE (138 +/- 16 mg/dl) and in E+G (165 +/- 12) compared with CON (206 +/- 15). Baseline plasma glucagon ( approximately 90 pg/ml) decreased by approximately 20% to 73 +/- 4 pg/ml in EXE (P < 0.01) and was not different from CON in E+G (81 +/- 2). EGP was suppressed by exenatide [231 +/- 9 to 108 +/- 8 mg/min (54%) vs. 254 +/- 29 to189 +/- 27 mg/min (26%, P < 0.001, EXE vs. CON] and partially reversed by glucagon replacement [247 +/- 15 to 173 +/- 18 mg/min (31%)]. Oral glucose appearance was 39 +/- 4 g in CON vs. 23 +/- 6 g in EXE (P < 0.001) and 15 +/- 5 g in E+G, (P < 0.01 vs. CON). The glucose retained within the splanchnic bed increased from approximately 36g in CON to approximately 52g in EXE and to approximately 60g in E+G (P < 0.001 vs. CON). Acetaminophen((AUC)) was reduced by approximately 80% in EXE vs. CON (P < 0.01). We conclude that exenatide infusion attenuates postprandial hyperglycemia by decreasing EGP (by approximately 50%) and by slowing gastric emptying.