The primary purposes of this investigation were to (a) continue a line of research examining the psychometric defensibility of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener - Teacher Rating Scale (SAEBRS-TRS), and (b) develop and preliminarily evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel multiple gating procedure based on teacher nomination and the SAEBRS-TRS. Two studies were conducted with elementary and middle school student samples across two separate geographic locations. Study 1 (n=864 students) results supported SAEBRS-TRS defensibility, revealing acceptable to optimal levels of internal consistency reliability, concurrent validity, and diagnostic accuracy. Findings were promising for a combined multiple gating procedure, which demonstrated acceptable levels of sensitivity and specificity. Study 2 (n=1534 students), which replicated Study 1 procedures, further supported the SAEBRS-TRS' psychometric defensibility in terms of reliability, validity, and diagnostic accuracy. Despite the incorporation of revisions intended to promote sensitivity levels, the combined multiple gating procedure's diagnostic accuracy was similar to that found in Study 1. Taken together, results build upon prior research in support of the applied use of the SAEBRS-TRS, as well as justify future research regarding a SAEBRS-based multiple gating procedure. Implications for practice and study limitations are discussed.

Purpose The factors affecting frequency discrimination in school-age children are poorly understood. The goal of the present study was to evaluate developmental effects related to memory for pitch and the utilization of temporal fine structure. Method Listeners were 5.1- to 13.6-years-olds and adults, all with normal hearing. A subgroup of children had musical training. The task was a three-alternative forced choice, where listeners identified the interval with the higher frequency tone or the frequency modulated (FM) tone. The standard was 500 or 5000 Hz, and the FM rate was either 2 or 20 Hz. Results Thresholds tended to be higher for younger children than for older children and adults for all conditions, although this age effect was smaller for FM detection than for pure-tone frequency discrimination. Neither standard frequency nor modulation rate affected the child/adult difference in FM thresholds. Children with musical training performed better than their peers on pure-tone frequency discrimination at 500 Hz. Conclusions Testing frequency discrimination using a low-rate FM detection task may minimize effects related to cognitive factors, like memory for pitch or training effects. Maturation of frequency discrimination does not appear to differ across conditions in which listeners are hypothesized to rely on temporal cues and place cues.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric defensibility of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS): a quick and easy universal screener for behavioral and emotional risk. Elementary school teachers completed the SAEBRS with 346 students in Grades 3 to 5. Teachers also completed two criterion measures, including the Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS) and the Student Internalizing Behavior Screener (SIBS). Additional extant behavioral and academic data sources were collected including office discipline referrals, suspensions, curriculum-based measurement scores, and statewide achievement test scores. Reliability analyses were indicative of the internal consistency of all four SAEBRS scales, whereas correlational analyses and Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon tests supported the criterion-related and construct validity. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses suggested each SAEBRS scale was associated with acceptable or optimal diagnostic accuracy. However, cut scores selected as most appropriate within each SAEBRS scale were found to differ from those identified in previous studies, potentially suggesting the influence of criterion outcome under consideration on SAEBRS diagnostic accuracy. Limitations and future directions for research are discussed, with emphasis on the need for continued examination of the extent of variability in SAEBRS cut score performance.

Objective This study tested the hypothesis that word recognition in a complex, two-talker masker is more closely related to real-world speech perception for children with hearing loss than testing performed in quiet or steady-state noise. Design Sixteen school-age hearing aid users were tested on aided word recognition in noise and two-talker speech. Unaided estimates of speech perception in quiet were retrospectively obtained from the clinical record. Ten parents completed a questionnaire regarding their children’s ease of communication and understanding in background noise. Results Unaided performance in quiet was correlated with aided performance in competing noise, but not in two-talker speech. Only results in the two-talker masker were correlated with parental reports of their children’s functional hearing abilities. Conclusions Speech perception testing in a complex background such as two-talker speech may provide a more accurate predictor of the communication challenges of children with hearing loss than testing in steady noise or quiet.

The purpose of this study was to conduct reliability and validity generalization meta-analyses of evidence regarding the Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS), a universal screener for externalizing behavior problems. A systematic review of the literature resulted in the identification of 17 studies inclusive of evidence regarding SRSS score (a) internal consistency reliability (i.e., alpha coefficients), and/or (b) criterion-related validity (e.g., correlations between the SRSS and various outcomes). Multilevel meta-analyses indicated that across studies, SRSS scores were associated with adequate internal consistency (α = .83). Analyses further suggested the SRSS was a valid indicator of both social and behavioral outcomes (r = .52) and academic outcomes (r = .42). Follow-up analyses suggested that in accordance with theory-driven expectations, the SRSS was a stronger indicator of externalizing problems and broad behavior outcomes relative to alternative outcomes (e.g., internalizing problems). Limitations and directions for future research are discussed, including recommendations for the collection of additional SRSS diagnostic accuracy evidence.