Hypoglycaemia is the limiting factor in the glycaemic management of diabetes. Iatrogenic hypoglycaemia is typically the result of the interplay of insulin excess and compromised glucose counterregulation in Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Insulin concentrations do not decrease and glucagon and epinephrine concentrations do not increase normally as glucose concentrations decrease. The concept of hypoglycaemia-associated autonomic failure (HAAF) in Type I diabetes posits that recent antecedent iatrogenic hypoglycaemia causes both defective glucose counterregulation (by reducing the epinephrine response in the setting of an absent glucagon response) and hypoglycaemia unawareness (by reducing the autonomic and the resulting neurogenic symptom responses). Perhaps the most compelling support for HAAF is the finding that as little as 2 to 3 weeks of scrupulous avoidance of hypoglycaemia reverses hypoglycaemia unawareness and improves the reduced epinephrine component of defective glucose counterregulation in most affected patients. The mediator and mechanism of HAAF are not known but are under active investigation. The glucagon response to hypoglycaemia is also reduced in patients approaching the insulin deficient end of the spectrum of Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, and glycaemic thresholds for autonomic (including epinephrine) and symptomatic responses to hypoglycaemia are shifted to lower plasma glucose concentrations after hypoglycaemia in Type II diabetes. Thus, patients with advanced Type II diabetes are also at risk for HAAF. While it is possible to minimise the risk of hypoglycaemia by reducing risks -including a 2 to 3 week period of scrupulous avoidance of hypoglycaemia in patients with hypoglycaemia unawareness -methods that provide glucose-regulated insulin replacement or secretion are needed to eliminate hypoglycaemia and maintain euglycaemia over a lifetime of diabetes. [Diabetologia (2002) 45:937-948] Keywords Hypoglycaemia, glucagon, epinephrine, adrenal medulla, sympathetic nervous system, hypoglycaemia-associated autonomic failure.

Hypoglycemia elicits a characteristic sequence of responses in healthy humans. These responses (and their arterialized venous glycemic thresholds) include: 1) Decreased insulin secretion (approximately 4.5 mmol/L). 2) Increased glucose counterregulatory hormone (glucagon, epinephrine, growth hormone and cortisol) secretion (approximately 3.6-3.8 mmol/L). 3) Symptoms of hypoglycemia (approximately 3.0 mmol/L). 4) Cognitive dysfunction (approximately 2.6 mmol/L). Thus, insulin secretion decreases as plasma glucose levels fall within the physiological range, and counterregulatory hormone secretion increases as plasma glucose levels fall just below the physiological range at substantially higher glucose levels than those required to produce symptoms and impair cognitive function. These data are entirely consistent with the body of evidence that insulin, glucagon and epinephrine stand high in the hierarchy of redundant glucoregulatory factors that prevent, as well as correct, hypoglycemia. When the same methods are used, these thresholds are remarkably reproducible from laboratory to laboratory. Nonetheless, the glycemic thresholds are dynamic rather than static. They vary in relation to recent antecedent glycemia. For example, lower plasma glucose concentrations are required to elicit autonomic, including epinephrine, and symptomatic responses in patients with well controlled IDDM, a phenomenon best attributed to recent antecedent iatrogenic hypoglycemia. This is the basis of the clinical syndrome of hypoglycemia unawareness, which is now known to be reversible with scrupulous avoidance of iatrogenic hypoglycemia. The latter also at least partially reverses reduced epinephrine responses to hypoglycemia, a key component (in the setting of absent glucagon responses) of the syndrome of defective glucose counterregulation. While perhaps seemingly adaptive, these threshold shifts appear to be maladaptive since both defective glucose counterregulation and hypoglycemia unawareness are associated with substantially increased rates of severe iatrogenic hypoglycemia in people with IDDM.

In view of evidence that neither interindividual nor induced intra-individual variations of adrenergic receptor status are related to metabolic or haemodynamic sensitivity to adrenaline in vivo, we took an alternative approach to assessment of the relevance of adrenergic receptor measurement by measuring these in a group of subjects with well-documented adrenergic denervation hypersensitivity, patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Mononuclear leukocyte beta 2-adrenergic receptor densities (and binding affinities), measured with 125I-labelled pindolol, and isoproterenol-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation, in samples from patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) with diabetic autonomic neuropathy (n = 8), were no different from those in samples from patients with IDDM without neuropathy (n = 8), or from non-diabetic subjects (n = 8). In addition, platelet alpha 2-adrenergic receptor densities (and binding affinities), measured with 3H-labelled yohimbine, and adrenaline-induced suppression of cyclic AMP contents did not differ among the three groups. Thus, in contrast to idiopathic autonomic failure, there is no generalized increase in adrenergic receptors in autonomic failure due to diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Regardless of the mechanism of adrenergic denervation hypersensitivity in such patients, these data provide further evidence that measurements of cellular adrenergic receptors (and adenylate cyclase) in vitro are a fallible index of sensitivity to catecholamines in vivo.

No abstract

No abstract