This thesis critically examines correctional discourse on prisoner self-injury produced by the Correctional Service of Canada's (CSC) Research Branch (RB) between 1990 and 2012.Since 2010, the RB has published over 700 pages worth of research on prisoner selfinjury. This new wave of research is identified in this thesis as a significant growth in correctional knowledge on self-injury. Self-injury in correctional environments has been a topic of much debate in recent years, where academics and governments alike have assessed the ability of the prison to adequately manage and treat self-injuring prisoners.Stepping back from these debates of the punitive versus therapeutic capabilities of the prison (Hannah-Moffat, 2001;Kendall, 1994;Kilty, 2006Kilty, , 2008b, this thesis examines what knowledges on prisoner self-injury are produced in correctional discourse and how these knowledges both enable and constrain understandings of self-injury in the prisoner population.Through a discourse analysis, this thesis identifies the discursive shifts in correctional knowledges on self-injury. Grounded in the extant clinical and correctional discourse that has historically constructed self-injury as practiced by manipulative, violent or suicidal prisoners, the new surge of research demonstrates a shift to predominately pathological explanations that aim to reduce the deviant behaviour to the manifestation of a mental illness. This domination of the 'psy-sciences' as 'intellectual technologies' (Rose, 1990(Rose, , 1996b in turn both demotes and bars sociological or otherwise non-psy understandings of self-injury. It is suggested that political accountabilities further shape the output of research. This is demonstrated in how the characterization of prisoners as pathologically inclined to self-injure lends to the CSC's displacement of responsibility for self-injury from the prison to prisoners' mental illness. I suggest that women prisoners are increasingly pathologized for their self-injurious behaviours in relation to men when the historical medicalization of women's madness (Ussher, 1991(Ussher, , 2011 is considered.This thesis contributes to critical debates on whether quantitative versus qualitative methods should be problematized as contributing to the production of knowledge. It is argued that it is not the research methodology that should be problematized, but rather the ideological platform from which the discourse originates. It is suggested that regardless of methodological approach, the RB's conceptualization of prisoners who engage in selfinjury was pre-determined by their ideological alignment with the psy-sciences. The implications of the recent shift in correctional discourse with respect to the responsibilization of prisoners for their mental illness(es) are also explored.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.