We have evaluated the development of antibodies in response to donor allograft valve implant in patients who received cellularized and decellularized allografts and determined possible immunogenic epitopes considered responsible for antibodies reactivity. Serum samples from all recipients who received cellularized allografts or decellularized allografts were collected before valve replacement and at 5, 10, 30 and 90 days post-operatively and frozen until required. Tests were performed using the Luminex-based single human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A, -B, -C and HLA-DR, -DQ antigen microsphere assay. To determine possible immunogenic epitopes, we used the HLAMatchmaker (HLAMM) software if applicable. Decellularized grafts elicited lower levels of anti-HLA class I and II antibody formation after implantation than cellularized allografts. All patients from cellularized group presented donor-specific antibodies class I and II within 3 months of observation period. In HLAMM analysis, the cellularized group had significantly higher numbers of immunogenic epitopes than decellularized group for both class I and II (p: 0.002 - cl I / p: 0.009 - cl II / p: 0.004 - cl I and II). Our findings demonstrate that the anti-HLA antibodies detected in the cellularized group were against donor HLA possible immunogenic epitopes and that in the decellularized group the anti-HLA antibodies were not against donor HLA possible immunogenic epitopes. These findings lead us to suggest that choosing sodium dodecyl sulfate decellularization process is the best alternative to decrease the immunogenicity of allograft valve transplant.

BackgroundThe identification of low-level antibodies by single-antigen bead methodology has brought advancements to risk evaluation of kidney transplant recipients. However, the use of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) to quantify antibodies and to guide therapy is not enough. Notably, immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclass switching is hypothesized to follow a programmed sequence after an emergency signal from the germinal center. In transplantation this process is not clear yet. In the present study, we sequentially evaluate anti-HLA donor specific antibody (DSA) subclasses, their profile changes, and C1q-binding ability and the influence of those characteristics on antibody mediated rejection (AMR) occurrence and allograft function.MethodsA total of 30 DSA-positive patients were tested for IgG subclass content and C1q-binding in sequential serum samples.ResultsTwenty-one patients were DSA-positive before transplant; patients sensitized only by transfusion or pregnancies had IgG1 and/or IgG3, and patients sensitized by both transfusion and pregnancies or previous transplant showed a broader range of IgG subclasses. C1q binding was detected in high MFI made up of IgG1 or multiple IgG subclasses. Only 4 patients were positive for C1q posttransplantation and 3 of these showed an increase in MFI, changes in subclasses patterns, AMR, and allograft dysfunction.ConclusionsPosttransplant evaluation of DSA subclasses and the ability to bind C1q may be informative for both AMR occurrence and allograft dysfunction. Monitoring these events may help to better define risk and interventional time points.

No abstract

Objective. To describe the clinical characteristics of cutaneous adverse reactions and cross-sensitivity induced by antiseizure medications and compare the pattern of use of antiseizure medications in patients with epilepsy according to skin rash history. Methods. We analysed patients with a history of skin rash presenting for up to 12 weeks after initiating antiseizure medication. The history of skin rash was verified by medical charts, interviews, and identification of skin lesions by patients based on illustrative images. The minimum follow-up period was eight months. The control group comprised epilepsy patients with regular antiseizure medication use for at least 12 weeks without skin rash. We included 109 cases and 99 controls. Results. The median (interquartile range) period from the index rash was six years (2-11). Carbamazepine was the trigger medication in 48% of cases and induced skin rashes in all patients with cross-sensitivity and carbamazepine exposure. Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, or drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms affected 36% of cases. Carbamazepine-or oxcarbazepine-induced maculopapular exanthema occurred earlier (median: one week) than that induced by other antiseizure medications (median: three weeks) (p=0.006). Cross-sensitivity was more common in patients with at least one episode of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (29%) and Stevens-Johnson/toxic epidermal necrolysis overlap (50%) than in patients with maculopapular exanthema (8%) (p=0.01). Although most cases were mild, the pattern of antiseizure medication use differed from that of controls, with a lower proportion of antiseizure medication typically associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, oxcarbazepine, and lamotrigine) (p<0.001). Most cases exposed to high-risk medication, however, did not develop cross-sensitivity. Significance. Cutaneous adverse reaction history may influence antiseizure medication use. Cross-sensitivity is more common in severe cases and most patients are affected by mild, self-limited skin rashes. Further research should consider the relevance of mild skin rashes in lifelong epilepsy treatment.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract