Highlights About two thirds of caregivers intend to vaccinate their children against COVID-19. Most common reason for acceptance was to protect the child. Most common reason for refusal was the vaccine’s novelty. Child age, chronic illness, vaccination history affects willingness. Caregiver gender, vaccination history, concern about infection affect willingness.

We examined the possibility of nonconscious associative learning in a context of skin conductance conditioning, using emotional facial expressions as stimuli. In the first experiment, subjects were conditioned to a backwardly masked angry face that was followed by electric shock, with a masked happy face as the nonreinforced stimulus. In spite of the effectively masked conditioned stimuli, differential conditioned skin conductance responses were observed in a subsequent nonmasked extinction phase. This effect could not be attributed to differential sensitization or pseudo-conditioning. In the second experiment, the differential responding during extinction was replicated with angry but not with happy faces as conditioned stimuli. It was concluded that with fear-relevant facial expressions as the conditioned stimulus, associative learning was possible even in conditions where the subjects remained unaware of the conditioned stimulus and its relationship to the unconditioned stimulus.

for the International COVID-19 Parental Attitude Study (COVIPAS) Group* Objectives To determine factors associated with parents who plan to vaccinate their children against influenza next year, especially those who did not vaccinate against influenza last year using a global survey. Study design A survey of caregivers accompanying their children aged 1-19 years old in 17 pediatric emergency departments in 6 countries at the peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Anonymous online survey included caregiver and child demographic information, vaccination history and future intentions, and concern about the child and caregiver having COVID-19 at the time of emergency department visit. Results Of 2422 surveys, 1314 (54.2%) caregivers stated they plan to vaccinate their child against influenza next year, an increase of 15.8% from the previous year. Of 1459 caregivers who did not vaccinate their children last year, 418 (28.6%) plan to do so next year. Factors predicting willingness to change and vaccinate included child's up-todate vaccination status (aOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.29-3.32, P = .003); caregivers' influenza vaccine history (aOR 3.26, 95% CI 2.41-4.40, P < .010), and level of concern their child had COVID-19 (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17, P = .022). Conclusions Changes in risk perception due to COVID-19, and previous vaccination, may serve to influence decision-making among caregivers regarding influenza vaccination in the coming season. To promote influenza vaccination among children, public health programs can leverage this information.

Purpose To determine predictors associated with caregivers’ willingness to accept an accelerated regulatory process for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine development. Methods An international cross-sectional survey of 2557 caregivers arriving with their children to 17 pediatric Emergency Departments (ED) across six countries from March 26 to June 30, 2020. Caregivers were asked to select one of four choices they agreed with the most regarding a proposed COVID-19 vaccine approval process, in addition to questions regarding demographics, the ED visit, and attitudes about COVID-19. Univariate analyses were conducted using the Mann-Whitney test for comparing non-normal continuous variables, independent t-test for comparing normally distributed continuous variables, and Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Variables of interest subsequently underwent a multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine independent factors associated with caregivers’ willingness to accept abridged COVID-19 vaccine development. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Findings Almost half (1101/2557; 43%) of caregivers reported that they are willing to accept less rigorous testing and post-research approval for a new COVID-19 vaccine. Independent factors associated with willingness to expedite COVID-19 vaccine research included children that were up-to-date on their vaccination schedule (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.72, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.29-2.31), caregivers concerned that they had COVID-19 at the time of survey completion in the ED (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.05-1.16), and caregivers that intend to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 if a vaccine becomes available (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.54-2.21). Mothers completing the survey were less likely to approve changes in the vaccine development process (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.53-0.78). Implications Less than half of caregivers in a global sample are willing to accept abbreviated vaccine testing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As part of an effort to increase acceptance and uptake of the new vaccine, especially in order to protect children, public health strategies and individual providers should understand caregivers’ attitudes towards approval of the vaccine and consult them appropriately.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has taken an unprecedented global toll and vaccination is needed to restore healthy living. Timely inclusion of children in vaccination trials is critical. We surveyed caregivers of children seeking care in 17 Emergency Departments (ED) across 6 countries during the peak of the pandemic to identify factors associated with intent to participate in COVID-19 vaccine trials. Questions about child and parent characteristics, COVID-19 expressed concerns and parental attitudes toward participation in a trial were asked. Of 2768 completed surveys, 18.4% parents stated they would enroll their child in a clinical trial for a COVID-19 vaccine and 14.4% would agree to a randomized placebo-controlled study. Factors associated with willingness to participate were parents agreeing to enroll in a COVID-19 vaccine trial themselves (Odds Ratio (OR) 32.9, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (21.9-51.2)) having an older child (OR 1.0 (1.0-1.01)), having children who received all vaccinations based on their country schedule (OR 2.67 (1.35-5.71)) and parents with high school education or lower (OR 1.79 (1.18-2.74)). Mothers were less likely to enroll their child in a trial (OR 0.68 (0.47-0.97)). Only one fifth of families surveyed will consider enrolling their child in a vaccine trial. Parental interest in participation, history of vaccinating their child, and the child being older all are associated with parents allowing their child to participate in a COVID vaccine trial. This information may help decision-makers and researchers shape their strategies for trial design and participation engagement in upcoming COVID19 vaccination trials.

Objective To determine if caregivers of children presenting to pediatric emergency departments (EDs) during the COVID-19 pandemic are delaying presenting to care for fear of contracting COVID-19. Methods This was a pre-planned secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey study of caregivers accompanying their children aged 0–19 years to 16 pediatric EDs in 5 countries from May to June 2020. An anonymous online survey, completed by caregivers via RedCAP, included caregiver and child demographics, presenting complaints, if they delayed presentation and whether symptoms worsened during this interval, as well as caregiver concern about the child or caregiver having COVID-19 at the time of ED visit. Results Of 1543 caregivers completing the survey, 287 (18.6%) reported a delay in seeking ED care due to concerns of contracting COVID-19 in the hospital. Of those, 124 (43.2%) stated their child’s symptoms worsened during the waiting interval. Caregiver relationship to child [mother] (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.27–2.76), presence of chronic illness in child (OR 1.78. 95% CI 1.14–2.79), younger age of caregiver (OR 0.965, 95% CI 0.943–0.986), and caregiver concerns about lost work during the pandemic (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04–1.12) were independently associated with a COVID-19-related delayed presentation in multivariable regression analysis. Conclusions Almost one in five caregivers reported delaying ED presentation for their ill or injured child specifically due to fear of contracting COVID-19 while in hospital, with mothers, younger caregivers, caregivers of children with chronic illness, and those concerned about lost work more likely to report delaying ED presentation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43678-021-00174-z.

No abstract

The objective of this study is to assess the impact of various actions in the management of pain in a pediatric hospital emergency department. This is an observational study, preaction (phase 1) and postaction (phase 2), with two cohorts of patients diagnosed with abdominal pain, chest pain, and severe headache. Between the two phases, various actions were carried out (distribution of pain assessment scales and a new guide for the management of pain, and the holding of clinical training sessions). Three hundred patients were included in the study, with an average age of 9 years and average evolution time of pain of 20 h. Pain assessment in phases 1 and 2 was 30 and 99.3%, respectively. Analgesics were administered to 23% (phase 1) and 38.6% (phase 2) of the patients with pain. No side-effects from the analgesics given were recorded. In conclusion, the various actions carried out yielded an improvement in pain management, especially in its assessment.