The current inadequacy of Italian services offering specialized support for GD youth may lead to negative consequences. Omitting or delaying treatment is not a neutral option. In fact, some GD adolescents may develop psychiatric problems, suicidality, and social marginalization. With access to specialized GD services, emotional problems, as well as self-harming behavior, may decrease and general functioning may significantly improve. In particular, puberty suppression seems to be beneficial for GD adolescents by relieving their acute suffering and distress and thus improving their quality of life.

Long-acting injectable testosterone undecanoate (TU) is a promising androgen for male hormonal contraception. As a prerequisite for a planned multicenter male contraceptive efficacy study, we studied the pharmacokinetics of 2 doses of TU alone or in combination with norethisterone enanthate (NETE) in a prospective 2-center study, randomized for TU dose in each center. Twenty healthy male volunteers in each center were administered intramuscular injections of 750 or 1000 mg TU alone or in combination with 200 mg of NETE IM every 8 weeks for 3 injections. There were no significant differences in maximum concentration and area under the curve (AUC) for serum total and free testosterone (T) between the TU 750 and 1000 mg groups, irrespective of whether TU was administered with 200 mg of NETE. TU 1000 mg IM alone or with NETE at 8-weekly intervals resulted in linear increases in average concentration and AUC of serum total and free T with each injection. Accumulation ratios of serum total and free T levels (calculated as 8 weeks post-to preinjection levels) for each period showed significant increases in the TU+ NETE groups. Serum gonadotropins levels and sperm concentration were more consistently suppressed in the TU 1000 mg + NETE group. We conclude that despite some accumulation of T, TU 1000 mg + NETE 200 mg administered every 8 weeks may be preferable for the future contraceptive efficacy study because of more complete suppression of gonadotropins and spermatogenesis.

This study aimed to establish whether the degree of suppression of serum FSH and LH was related to sperm concentration in three testosterone (T) plus progestin contraceptive regimens. We measured serum FSH and LH using a modified, highly sensitive immunofluorometric assay in samples obtained from three published studies using T enanthate (TE; 100 and 200 mg weekly) plus daily oral doses of cyproterone acetate (CPA; 5-100 mg), levonogestrel (LNG; 150-500 micro g), or desogestrel (DSG; 150-300 micro g). Overall, men with sperm concentrations below 0.1 million/ml had significantly lower gonadotropin levels (serum FSH, approximately 0.12 IU/liter; serum LH, approximately 0.05 IU/liter) than oligospermic men (sperm concentrations, 0.1-5 million/ml; serum FSH, 0.23-0.5 IU/liter; serum LH, 0.05-0.56 IU/liter), but the relationship was weak, indicating the possible existence of other determinants. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the influence of candidate predictors of spermatogenic effects of the T plus progestin regimens. In the LNG and DSG studies, the marked suppression of serum LH to less than 5% of baseline values (<0.15 IU/liter) was a consistent and highly significant predictor of sperm concentration (reduced to 2-7% that seen at higher LH levels) and the likelihood of its suppression below 1 million/ml (a proposed threshold for contraceptive efficacy). Serum FSH was not a significant independent predictor. The use of DSG and CPA (but not LNG) was a significant independent predictor of sperm suppression, and regimens that contained 200 mg TE weekly caused less spermatogenic suppression than 100 mg TE weekly. These findings suggest that T-progestin contraceptive regimens suppress sperm concentration by gonadotropin-dependent and -independent mechanisms. The suppression of serum LH is a major predictor of the suppression of sperm concentration suppression in the LNG and DSG treatment studies. On the other hand, the greater spermatogenic suppression in regimens containing DSG or CPA suggests that these progestins have additional actions to suppress spermatogenesis via a gonadotropin-independent mechanism(s)

No abstract