Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is the most common aortic catastrophe. The mortality rate of type A dissection approaches 40% to 50% in 48 hours. Causes of death include rupture, aortic insufficiency, or malperfusion involving the coronary arteries, head vessels, visceral arteries, and lower extremities. Other acute aortic conditions can be confused with AAD. Emergent surgery is usually recommended, although there are some situations in which initial management of malperfusion or conservative therapy can be considered prior to proximal aortic repair. Various surgical techniques are employed to manage AAD. This article reviews the etiology, clinical presentations, and management of patients with type A AAD.

Background:Surgical delay remains a common method for improving flap survival. However, the optimal surgical technique has not been determined. In this article, we compare flap perfusion, viable surface area, and flap contraction of 2 surgical delay techniques.Methods:Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 3 groups. In the incisional surgical delay group (n = 9), a 9 × 3 cm dorsal flap was incised on 3 sides without undermining, leaving a cranial pedicle. In the bipedicle surgical delay group (BSD, n = 9), a 9 × 3 cm dorsal flap was incised laterally and undermined, leaving cranial and caudal pedicles. Control group (n = 16) animals did not undergo a delay procedure. Ten days following surgical delay, all flaps for all groups were raised, leaving a cranial pedicle. A silicone sheet separated the flap and the wound bed. On postoperative day (POD) 7, viable surface area was determined clinically. Contraction compared to POD 0 was measured with ImageJ software. Perfusion was measured with Laser Doppler Imaging. The Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test was performed for group comparisons.Results:BSD preserved significantly more viable surface area on POD 7 (13.7 ± 4.5 cm2) than Control (8.7 ± 1.8 cm2; P = 0.01). BSD also showed significantly less contraction (21.0% ± 13.5%) than Control (45.9% ± 19.7%; P = 0.0045). BSD and incisional surgical delay showed significantly increased perfusion compared with Control on POD 0 (P = 0.02 and 0.049, respectively), which persisted on POD 3. This trend resolved by POD 7.Conclusion:BSD showed improved early perfusion, increased viable surface area, and reduced contraction compared to control, suggesting that BSD is the superior flap design for preclinical modeling.

Background: Abdminoplasty remains the sixth most commonly performed cosmetic surgical procedure in 2011 according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Despite such vast experience, seroma and other wound complications rates remain relatively unchanged. The technique of progressive tension sutures (PTS), popularized by Pollock in 2000 as a method to decrease the rates of such complications, has been met with mixed reviews despite a remarkable 0.1% seroma formation rate in their recent review of 597 consecutive cases. Therefore, a comparison of the application of the PTS technique versus traditional abdominoplasty technique in reducing complication rates as performed by a single surgeon, at a single center with a cohesive patient population was needed.