To investigate blastocysts, defined as euploid and aneuploid by trophectoderm (TE) cell analysis, for the presence of DNA in the blastocoelic fluid (BF) detected by whole-genomic amplification (WGA); and to correlate the presence of DNA in BF with the clinical outcome after the transfer of TE-euploid blastocysts. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: In vitro fertilization unit. Patient(s): This study included 91 patients performing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on TE cells from January 2015 to December 2017. In the case of ET, only single blastocyst transfers were performed. Intervention(s): Blastocoelic fluids and TE cells were retrieved from 256 blastocysts before vitrification. All blastocysts were diagnosed by array-comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) on TE cells. Amplification and a-CGH of DNA from BFs was performed at a later time after TE biopsy and ET. Main Outcome Measure(s): Whole-genomic amplification of BFs, evaluation of the chromosome condition in BFs and TE cells, and correlation of BF results with the clinical outcome of TE-euploid transferred blastocysts. Result(s): The incidence of amplification after WGA was significantly lower in BFs from TE-euploid blastocysts (n ¼ 32, 45%) when compared with the aneuploid ones (n ¼ 150, 81%), resulting in 182 BFs with successful DNA amplification. When submitted to a-CGH, informative results were obtained from 172 BFs. Comparison of these results with those from the corresponding TE cells gave a ploidy concordance of 93.6% and a mean number of aneuploid events per sample that was higher in BFs than in TE cells (2.0 vs. 1.4, respectively). After the transfer of 53 TE-euploid blastocysts, the clinical pregnancy rate was 77% in the group with BF-failed amplification, and 37% after BF-successful amplification. The same trend was found for the ongoing pregnancy rate (68% vs. 31.5%, respectively). Conclusion(s): The presence of DNA in BFs detected by WGA is correlated with the blastocyst ploidy condition defined by TE cell biopsy and with the implantation potential of TE-euploid blastocysts. These findings could have a clinical implication for the selection of the most viable embryo for transfer because, after submitting BFs to WGA, priority would be given to TE-euploid blastocysts with BFfailed amplification. Similarly, BF-failed amplification could be an additional selection criterion to prioritize embryos for transfer even in conventional IVF cycles with blastocysts that were vitrified after BF aspiration. (Fertil Steril Ò 2019;111:77-85. Ó2018 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.) El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo.

No abstract

STUDY QUESTION Is de novo segmental aneuploidy (SA) a biological event or an artifact that is erroneously interpreted as partial chromosome imbalance? SUMMARY ANSWER The detection of de novo SA in sequential biopsies of preimplantation embryos supports the biological nature of SA. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Although some SAs are detected in oocytes and in blastocysts, the highest incidence is observed in cleavage-stage embryos. Based on these findings, we can postulate that the majority of cells affected by SAs are eliminated by apoptosis or that affected embryos mainly undergo developmental arrest. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective study includes 342 preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles performed between January 2014 and December 2018. Chromosome analysis was performed on 331 oocytes, 886 cleavage-stage embryos and 570 blastocysts (n = 1787). From 268 expanded blastocysts, the blastocoelic fluid (BF) was also analyzed (resulting in 2025 samples in total). In cases of SAs involving loss or gain in excess of 15 Mb, embryos were not considered for transfer and sequential biopsies were performed at following stages. This resulted in 66 sets where the initial diagnosis of SAs (4 made in polar bodies, 25 in blastomeres and 37 in trophectoderm (TE) cells) was followed up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A total of 2082 samples (2025 + 27 whole embryos) were processed by whole genome amplification followed by array comparative genomic hybridization. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The incidence of SAs was 6.3% in oocytes, increased to 16.6% in cleavage-stage embryos (P < 0.001) and decreased to 11.2% in blastocysts (P < 0.025 versus oocytes; P < 0.01 versus cleavage-stage embryos). The highest incidence of SAs was found in BFs (26.1%, P < 0.001). The analysis of 66 sets of sequential biopsies revealed that the initial finding was confirmed in all following samples from 39 sets (59.1% full concordance). In 12 additional sets, SAs were detected in some samples while in others the interested chromosome had full aneuploidy (18.2%). In three more sets, there was a partial concordance with the initial diagnosis in some samples, but in all TE samples the interested chromosome was clearly euploid (4.5%). In the remaining 12 sets, the initial SA was not confirmed at any stage and the corresponding chromosomes were euploid (18.2% no concordance). The pattern of concordance was not affected by the number of SAs in the original biopsy (single, double or complex) or by the absence or presence of concomitant aneuploidies for full chromosomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Chromosome analyses were performed on biopsies that might not be representative of the true constitution of the embryo itself due to the occurrence of mosaicism. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The permanence of SAs throughout the following stages of embryo development in more than half of the analyzed sets suggests for this dataset a very early origin of this type of chromosome imbalance, either at meiosis or at the first mitotic divisions. Since SAs remained in full concordance with the initial diagnosis until the blastocyst stage, a corrective mechanism seems not to be in place. In the remaining cases, it is likely that, as for full chromosome aneuploidy, mosaicism derived from mitotic errors could have occurred. In following cell divisions, euploid cell lines could prevail preserving the embryo chances of implantation. Due to the scarcity of data available, the transfer of embryos with SAs should be strictly followed up to establish possible clinical consequences related to this condition. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No specific funding was obtained. There are no conflicts of interest.

The identification of viable embryos for transfer is one of the main challenges in reproductive medicine. As chromosomal abnormalities are the major cause of implantation failure, preimplantation genetic testing of aneuploidy plays an important role in embryo selection. To make this approach more efficient, the possibility to retrieve informative DNA through a moderately invasive technique compared to the traditional forms of biopsy is appealing. Blastocoelic fluid is a valuable source of DNA. Its presence, as detected by whole genomic amplification, and the following analysis by comprehensive chromosome screening could add important information on the blastocyst ploidy condition and developmental potential.

No abstract