Background Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy that most commonly affects the pleural layers. MPM has a strong association with asbestos, mainly caused by exposure to its biopersistent fibers in at least 80% of cases. Individuals with a chronic exposure to asbestos might develop disease with a 20–40-year latency with few or no symptoms. Such has been the case in the Italian regions of Piedmont and Lombardy, where industrial production of materials laden with asbestos, mainly cements, has been responsible for the onset of a large epidemic. Since 2018, a multidisciplinary team at San Matteo hospital in Pavia has been collecting data on over 100 patients with MPM. The main goal of this project is to define and describe an integrated profile for each MPM case at diagnosis by using data mining and partition analysis. Methods Here we bring together exhaustive epidemiologic, histologic and radiologic data of 88 MPM patients that came to our observation and draw correlations with predictive and prognostic significance. Results The median overall survival (OS) was 15.6 months. Most patients presented with pleural effusion, irrespective of disease stage. Quite unexpectedly, no statistically significant association was demonstrated between OS and TNM disease stage at diagnosis. Although average OS is similar in male and female patients, partition analysis of data underlined a significant differential hierarchy of predictor categories based on patient gender. In females with no smoking history, full chemotherapeutic regimens are associated with better outcomes. Moreover, concerning second line treatments, vinorelbine emerged as the most advantageous choice for female patients, whereas in the male subgroup no statistically significant difference resulted between gemcitabine and vinorelbine. Conclusion A multidisciplinary approach to MPM is mandatory to define better therapeutic approaches, personalize the management and improve patient outcomes.

Background and Objective: Translational research is a source of continuous innovation in medicine, more particularly for clinical research on new treatment modalities in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients.However, the heterogeneity of the disease is well recognized, and different pathological and molecular settings have been identified. The molecular mechanisms by which IPF proceeds in time and space remains poorly understood. Although some IPF features are reminiscent of cancer, the dynamics of malignant divergent clonal selective pressure and heterogeneity clearly differ from those occurring in IPF. This is reflected in the absence of patient proper selection and stratification to biological agents (pirfenidone, nintedanib) which limit therapeutic efficacy. Consequently, increased costs are related to the clinical management of advanced IPF patients. Steady collaboration and fluid communication between pneumo-oncologists, radiologists and molecular biologists is a clear priority for the correct interpretation of tests and the definition of effective personalized strategies against this orphan disease. The present work aims at providing the most relevant hints shared by cancer and IPF.Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify all relevant data. The examined databases were Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and PubMed. The last search was run on January 5, 2022. We have primarily conducted separated research for lung cancer, IPF, genetics, epigenetics, surgery in IPF and cancer.

Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare condition, frequently complicated by pulmonary arteries’ aneurysm. Aggressive medical therapy is often unsatisfactory and lung transplantation remains the only option. We report a unique case of severe idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension complicated by a giant pulmonary aneurism, massive pulmonary valve regurgitation, and right ventricle dysfunction. The patient was, as our first choice, listed for heart–lung transplantation and remained in emergency list for more than 7 months. Unfortunately, due to further clinical deterioration and the unavailability of a heart–lung bloc, plan B was mandatory. The patient underwent a combined procedure including: double lung transplant, pulmonary artery plasty, and sutureless pulmonary valve prosthesis with open deployment (first‐in‐man use in such scenario). Postoperative outcome was uneventful. Our thought is that double lung transplantation and conventional combined pulmonary artery/valve surgery should be considered as the first option avoiding excessive waiting times and potential further clinical deterioration.

Despite the progress during the last decade, patients with advanced gastric and esophageal cancers still have poor prognosis. Finding optimal therapeutic strategies represents an unmet need in this field. Several prognostic and predictive factors have been evaluated and may guide clinicians in choosing a tailored treatment. Data from large studies investigating the role of immunotherapy in gastrointestinal cancers are promising but further investigations are necessary to better select those patients who can mostly benefit from these novel therapies. This review will focus on the treatment of metastatic esophageal and gastric cancer. We will review the standard of care and the role of novel therapies such as immunotherapies and CAR-T. Moreover, we will focus on the analysis of potential predictive biomarkers such as Modify as: Microsatellite Instability (MSI) and PD-L1, which may lead to treatment personalization and improved treatment outcomes. A multidisciplinary point of view is mandatory to generate an integrated approach to properly exploit these novel antiproliferative agents.

Background. Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy that most commonly affects the pleural lining of the lungs. MPM has a strong association with asbestos being at least 80% of cases caused by exposure to its biopersistent fibers. Individuals with a chronic exposure to asbestos might refer a 20-40-year latency with no or few symptoms. Such has been the case of Piedmont and Lombardy regions of Italy where industrial production of materials laden with asbestos, mainly cements, has created a large epidemic. Since 2018 in Pavia San Matteo hospital, a multidisciplinary team has been collecting data on over 100 patients with MPM. The main goal of this project is to define and describe an integrated profile for each MPM case at diagnosis by using data mining and partition analysis. Methods. Here we bring together exhaustive epidemiologic, histologic, radiologic data of 88 MPM patients that came to our observation to draw correlations with predictive and prognostic significance. Results. Overall, the median survival (OS) was of 15.6 months. Most patients presented with pleural effusion, irrespective of disease stage. Quite unexpectedly, no statistically significant association had been demonstrated between OS and TNM disease stage at diagnosis. Although average OS is similar in male and female patients, partition analysis of data underlined a significant differential hierarchy of predictor categories based on patient gender. In never smoker female patients, full chemotherapeutic regimens are associated to better outcomes. Moreover, within respect to second line treatments, vinorelbine emerged as the most advantageous choice but only in females, whereas in the male subgroup no statistically significant differences resulted between gemcitabine and vinorelbine. Conclusions. Multidisciplinary approach to MPM is thus mandatory to define better therapeutic approaches, personalize the management and improve patient outcomes.

Surgery is part of a multimodal therapeutic approach to malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) although its real beneficial effect is still controversial. The optimal precise sequence of treatments within the trimodality is unclear, and should be decided upon a multidisciplinary consensus for each individual patient. Here, we analyzed the perioperative data of 19 MPM patients who underwent extended pleurectomy/ decortication (EPD) with curative intent. The mean age at diagnosis was 67 years; 11 males and eight females. Ten patients were diagnosed with MPM via medical thoracoscopy (MT), and nine via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The vast majority of cases harbored epitheliod forms. We compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by surgery (11 cases) versus surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT, 8 cases) within a 3-year period. All patients had extended pleurectomy/ decortication and none had an extended pneumonectomy. Analysis of survival curves suggested that the short-term outcomes are better with upfront EDP followed by ACT if compared to EDP preceded by NCT. Although limited, the data highlighted the safety and feasibility of EPD, with manageable postoperative complications and no major burden for the patients.

Background. Growing evidence suggests that sublobar resections offer more favorable outcomes than lobectomy in early-stage lung cancer surgery. However, a percentage of cases that cannot be ignored develops disease recurrence irrespective of the surgery performed with curative intent. The goal of this work is thus to compare different surgical approaches, namely, lobectomy and segmentectomy (typical and atypical) to derive prognostic and predictive markers. Patients and Methods. Here we analyzed a cohort of 153 NSCLC patients in clinical stage TNM I who underwent pulmonary resection surgery with a mediastinal hilar lymphadenectomy from January 2017 to December 2021, with an average follow-up of 25.5 months. Partition analysis was also applied to the dataset to detect outcome predictors. Results. The results of this work showed similar OS between lobectomy and typical and atypical segmentectomy for patients with stage I NSCLC. In contrast, lobectomy was associated with a significant improvement in DFS compared with typical segmentectomy in stage IA, while in stage IB and overall, the two treatments were similar. Atypical segmentectomy showed the worst performance, especially in 3-year DFS. Quite unexpectedly, outcome predictor ranking analysis suggests a prominent role of smoking habits and respiratory function, irrespective of the tumor histotype and the patient’s gender. Conclusions. Although the limited follow-up interval cannot allow conclusive remarks about prognosis, the results of this study suggest that both lung volumes and the degree of emphysema-related parenchymal damage are the strongest predictors of poor survival in lung cancer patients. Overall, these data point out that greater attention should be addressed to the therapeutic intervention for co-existing respiratory diseases to obtain optimal control of early lung cancer.

No abstract