Increased electricity production from renewable energy resources coupled with low natural gas prices has caused existing light-water reactors (LWRs) to experience ever-diminishing returns from the electricity market. Via a partnership among Idaho National Laboratory (INL), The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Exelon, and Fuel Cell Energy, a technoeconomic analysis of the viability of retrofitting existing pressurized water reactors (PWRs) to produce hydrogen (H2) via high-temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE) has been conducted. Such integration would allow nuclear facilities to expand into additional markets that may be more profitable in the long term.To accommodate such an integration, a detailed analysis of HTSE process operation, requirements, and flexibility was conducted. The technical analysis includes proposed nuclear system control scheme modifications to allow dynamic operation of the HTSE via both thermal and electrical connection to the nuclear plant. High-fidelity Modelica simulations showcase the viability of such control schemes. However, due to limited knowledge of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stack degradation due to thermal gradients, thermal cycling of the HTSE was not included. Therefore, the control schemes proposed are only utilized to re-distribute steam at startup, and only the portion of electricity utilized in the electrolyzers is cycled.From the detailed analysis of the nuclear integration and the HTSE process design, a comprehensive cost estimation was conducted in the APEA and H2A models to elucidate capital and operational costs associated with the production, compression, and distribution of hydrogen from a nuclear facility. Alongside this costing analysis, market analyses were conducted by NREL and ANL on the electric and hydrogen markets, respectively, in the PJM interconnect.Utilizing the electricity data market projections in the PJM interconnect from NREL and hydrogen demand/pricing projections from ANL, a five-variable sweep over component capacities, discount rates, and hydrogen pricing was completed using the stochastic framework RAVEN (Risk Analysis Virtual ENvironment) through its resource dispatch plugin HERON (Heuristic Energy Resource Optimization Network). Each combination of variables was evaluated over a seventeen-year timespan, from 2026-2042 (inclusive), to determine the most economically advantageous solution. Following the five-variable sweep, an optimization was conducted to establish the best sweep point to determine optimal component sizing and setpoints.Results suggest positive gain is achievable at all projected hydrogen market pricing levels and at all discount rates. However, exact component sizing and net returns vary based on these values, and if incorrect sizing is selected, major net losses can occur. The optimal result occurred with set points as follows: high hydrogen prices, the largest possible HTSE unit in the sweep set at 7.47 kg/sec (645.4 tpd), a contractual hydrogen market agreement 7.29 kg/sec (...