Objectives: To determine the treatment effects produced in Class II patients by the Carriere® Motion 3D™ appliance (CMA) followed by full fixed appliances (FFA). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 34 adolescents at three time points: T1 (pretreatment), T2 (removal of CMA), and T3 (posttreatment). The comparison group comprised 22 untreated Class II subjects analyzed at T1 and T3. Serial cephalograms were traced and digitized, and 12 skeletal and 6 dentoalveolar measures were compared. Results: Phase I with CMA lasted 5.2 ± 2.8 months; phase II with FFA lasted 13.0 ± 4.2 months. CMA treatment restricted the forward movement of the maxilla at point A. There was minimal effect on the sagittal position of the chin at pogonion. The Wits appraisal improved toward Class I by 2.1 mm during the CMA phase but not during FFA. Lower anterior facial height increased twice as much in the treatment group as in controls. A clockwise rotation (3.9°) of the functional occlusal plane in the treatment group occurred during phase I; a substantial rebound (−3.6°) occurred during phase II. Overjet and overbite improved during treatment, as did molar relationship; the lower incisors proclined (4.2°). Conclusions: The CMA appliance is an efficient and effective way of correcting Class II malocclusion. The changes were mainly dentoalveolar in nature, but some skeletal changes also occurred, particularly in the sagittal position of the maxilla and in the vertical dimension.

Objective To compare the transverse dental and skeletal changes in patients treated with bone‐anchored palatal expander (bone‐borne, BB) compared to patients treated with tooth and bone‐anchored palatal expanders (tooth‐bone‐borne, TBB) using cone‐beam computer tomography (CBCT) and 3D image analysis. Methods The sample comprised 30 patients with transverse maxillary discrepancy treated with two different types of appliances: bone‐borne (Group BB) and tooth‐bone‐borne (Group TBB) expanders. CBCT scans were acquired before (T1) and after completion of maxillary expansion (T2); the interval was 5.4 ± 3.4 and 6.2 ± 2.1 months between the T1 and the T2 scans of Group TBB (tooth‐bone‐borne) and Group BB (bone‐borne), respectively. Transverse, anteroposterior and vertical linear and angular three‐dimensional dentoskeletal changes were assessed after cranial base superimposition. Results Both groups displayed marked transverse skeletal expansion with a greater ratio of skeletal to dental changes. Greater changes at the nasal cavity, zygoma and orbital levels were found in Group BB. A relatively parallel sutural opening in an anterior–posterior direction was observed in Group TBB; however, the Group BB presented a somewhat triangular (V‐shaped) opening of the suture that was wider anteriorly. Small downward‐forward displacements were observed in both groups. Asymmetric expansion occurred in approximately 50% of the patients in both groups. Conclusion Greater skeletal vs dental expansion ratio and expansion of the circummaxillary regions were found in Group BB, the group in which a bone‐borne expander was used. Both groups presented skeletal and dental changes, with a similar amount of posterior palate expansion. Asymmetric expansion was observed in both groups.

No abstract