We have evaluated the ability of various opioid agonists, including methadone, L-␣-acetylmethadol (LAAM), fentanyl, meperidine, codeine, morphine, and buprenorphine, to block the cardiac human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) K ϩ current (I HERG ) in human cells stably transfected with the HERG potassium channel gene. Our results show that LAAM, methadone, fentanyl, and buprenorphine were effective inhibitors of I HERG , with IC 50 values in the 1 to 10 M range. The other drugs tested were far less potent with respect to I HERG inhibition. Compared with the reported maximal plasma concentration (C max ) after administration of therapeutic doses of these drugs, the ratio of IC 50 /C max was highest for codeine and morphine (Ͼ455 and Ͼ400, respectively), thereby indicating that these drugs have the widest margin of safety (of the compounds tested) with respect to blockade of I HERG . In contrast, the lowest ratios of IC 50 /C max were observed for LAAM and methadone (2.2 and 2.7, respectively). Further investigation showed that methadone block of I HERG was rapid, with steady-state inhibition achieved within 1 s when applied at its IC 50 concentration (10 M) for I HERG block. Results from "envelope of tails" tests suggest that the majority of block occurred when the channels were in the open and/or inactivated states, although ϳ10% of the available HERG K ϩ channels were apparently blocked in a closed state. Similar results were obtained for LAAM. These results demonstrate that LAAM and methadone can block I HERG in transfected cells at clinically relevant concentrations, thereby providing a plausible mechanism for the adverse cardiac effects observed in some patients receiving LAAM or methadone.Torsades de pointes is a potentially fatal form of ventricular arrhythmia that typically occurs under conditions where cardiac repolarization is delayed (as indicated by prolonged QT intervals from electrocardiographic recordings) (Goodman and Peter, 1995;Viskin, 1999). These conditions can be precipitated by drugs that block the cardiac potassium channels responsible for mediating ventricular repolarization. Remarkably, many different types of drugs, including some antiarrhythmics, antihistamines, antibiotics, gastrointestinal prokinetics, and antipsychotics (Faber et al., 1994;De Ponti et al., 2001), have been shown to cause QT prolongation, primarily through interference with the rapid component of the delayed rectifier potassium current, I Kr (Antzelevitch et al., 1996;January et al., 2000;Tamargo, 2000;Tseng, 2001). The human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) gene encodes for the major channel protein that underlies I Kr , and a recently developed cell line that was stably transfected with the HERG gene (Zhou et al., 1998) has proven useful for evaluating drugs suspected of causing delays in cardiac repolarization (Mohammad et al., 1997;Ferreira et al., 2001).In April 2001, the United States Food and Drug Administration issued a new warning about adverse cardiac events (Deamer et al., 2001) associated with th...

Numerous medications prolong the rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval and induce arrhythmias by blocking ionic current through cardiac potassium channels composed of subunits expressed by the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG). Recent reports suggest that high doses of methadone cause torsades de pointes. To date, no controlled study has described an association between methadone and QTc prolongation. The only commercial formulation of parenteral methadone available in the United States contains the preservative chlorobutanol. The objectives of this study are to determine: (1) whether the administration of intravenous (i.v.) methadone causes QTc prolongation in humans; (2) whether methadone and/or chlorobutanol block cardiac HERG potassium currents (IHERG) in vitro. Over 20 months, we identified every inpatient with at least one electrocardiogram (ECG) performed on i.v. methadone. For each patient, we measured QTc intervals for every available ECG performed on and off i.v. methadone. Concurrent methadone doses were also recorded. Similar data were collected for a separate group of inpatients treated with i.v. morphine. In a separate set of experiments IHERG was evaluated in transfected human embryonic kidney cells exposed to increasing concentrations of methadone, chlorobutanol, and the two in combination. Mean difference (+/- standard error) per patient in QTc intervals on and off methadone was 41.7 (+/- 7.8)ms, p<0.0001. Mean difference in QTc intervals on and off morphine was 9.0 (+/- 6.1)ms, p=0.15. The approximately linear relationship between QTc measurements and log-dose of methadone was significant (p<0.0001). Methadone and chlorobutanol independently block IHERG in a concentration-dependent manner with IC50 values of 20 +/- 2 microM and 4.4 +/- 0.3 mM, respectively. Chlorobutanol potentiates methadone's ability to block IHERG. Methadone in combination with chlorobutanol is associated with QTc interval prolongation. Our data strongly suggest that methadone in combination with chlorobutanol is associated with QTc interval prolongation.

Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facets is associated with an overall 1.0% incidence of minor complications per lesion site.

Transdermal fentanyl is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of chronic pain caused by malignancy and non-malignant conditions when administered according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Compared with oral opioids, the advantages of transdermal fentanyl include a lower incidence and impact of adverse effects (constipation, nausea and vomiting, and daytime drowsiness), a higher degree of patient satisfaction, improved quality of life, improved convenience and compliance resulting from administration every 72 hours, and decreased use of rescue medication. Transdermal fentanyl is a useful analgesic for cancer patients who are unable to swallow or have gastrointestinal problems. Transdermal fentanyl forms a depot within the upper skin layers before entering the microcirculation. Therapeutic blood levels are attained 12-16 hours after patch application and decrease slowly with a half-life of 16-22 hours following removal. Patients with chronic pain should be titrated to adequate relief with short-acting oral or parenteral opioids prior to the initiation of transdermal fentanyl in order to prevent exacerbations of pain or opioid-related adverse effects. Transdermal fentanyl can then be initiated based on the 24-hour opioid requirement once adequate analgesia has been achieved. The prolonged elimination of transdermal fentanyl can become problematic if patients develop opioid-related adverse effects, especially hypoventilation. Adverse effects do not improve immediately after patch removal and may take many hours to resolve. Patients who experience opioid-related toxicity associated with respiratory depression should be treated immediately with an opioid antagonist such as naloxone and closely monitored for at least 24 hours. Because of the short half-life of naloxone, sequential doses or a continuous infusion of the opioid antagonist may be necessary. Transdermal fentanyl should be administered cautiously to patients with pre-existing conditions such as emphysema that may predispose them to the development of hypoventilation. Transdermal fentanyl is indicated only for patients who require continuous opioid administration for the treatment of chronic pain that cannot be managed with other medications. It is contraindicated in the management of acute and postoperative pain, as pain may decrease more rapidly in these circumstances than fentanyl blood levels can be adjusted, leading to the development of life-threatening hypoventilation. Cognitive and physical impairments such as confusion and abnormal co-ordination can occur with transdermal fentanyl. Therefore, patients should be instructed to refrain from driving or operating machinery immediately following the initiation of transdermal fentanyl, or after any dosage increase. Patients may resume such activities once the absence of these potential adverse effects is documented.

In cancer patients, cognitive impairment, psychological distress, and anxiety may accompany and aggravate pain. Neuroleptics are frequently used to control these symptoms and may be used to treat pain that has been unresponsive to more conventional approaches. Because of prominent side effects of traditional neuroleptics and conflicting data regarding their analgesic efficacy, their use in the treatment of pain remains controversial. Olanzapine, an atypical neuroleptic, might offer advantages because of its safer side effect profile. It has also been shown to have an independent antinociceptive activity in animals. The use of olanzapine in the management of cancer pain has not been previously described. We prospectively collected the data on 8 cancer patients with severe pain, uncontrolled in spite of aggressive opioid titration, who received olanzapine to treat severe anxiety and mild cognitive impairment. Patients did not meet criteria for delirium and their cognitive impairment was defined as cognitive disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) according to DSM-IV. Patients received 2.5 to 7.5 mg of olanzapine daily. In all patients, opioid requirements had escalated rapidly prior to starting olanzapine. Levels of pain, sedation, and opioid use were measured 2 days before and 2 days after olanzapine was started. Cognitive state was assessed daily. All 8 patients had marked reduction of the daily pain scores. The average daily opioid use decreased significantly in all patients. Cognitive impairment and anxiety resolved within 24 hours of initiating olanzapine. In these 8 patients, decreased pain scores and opioid requirements may have resulted from improvement in cognitive function and the known anxiolytic effect of olanzapine. Other mechanisms may include independent or adjuvant analgesic effects of olanzapine. We conclude that olanzapine may be useful in the treatment of patients with uncontrolled cancer pain associated with cognitive impairment or anxiety. Further studies to evaluate possible analgesic effect of olanzapine are needed.

The successful use of methadone in cancer pain has been supported by numerous case reports and clinical studies. Methadone is usually used as a second or third line opioid medication. As the use of methadone increases we are facing the challenge of converting methadone to other opioids as part of sequential opioid trials. Data on the equianalgesic ratios for the substitution of other opioids for methadone are lacking. We present prospective data on 13 consecutive rotations from methadone to a different opioid. The opioid rotation was followed by escalation of pain and/or severe dysphoria, not controlled by a rapid increase in the dose of the second opioid, in 12 of the 13 patients. Only one patient was successfully maintained on the second opioid after the discontinuation of methadone, while 12 patients required a switch back to methadone. We conclude that opioid rotation from methadone to another opioid is often complicated by worsening pain and dysphoria. These symptoms may not improve despite upward titration of the second opioid. A uniformly accepted conversion ratio for substituting methadone with another opioid is currently not available. More data on the rotation from methadone to other opioids are needed.

No abstract

Methadone is currently best known for its use as the maintenance drug in opioid addiction. The main concern when using methadone for the treatment of pain is its long and unpredictable half-life, which is associated with the risk of delayed toxicity. This may result in side effects such as sedation and respiratory depression if careful titration and close observation of individual patient responses are not performed. For this reason, methadone is often viewed as a second line opioid, after other opioids with a more predictable dose-response have been tried. We report six patients with long-term exposure to methadone as a treatment for heroin dependency, who were also treated with methadone for cancer pain. The first five patients were at least partially refractory to the analgesic effects of opioids other than methadone. All six patients achieved analgesia without sedation or respiratory depression from aggressive upward methadone titration. Methadone analgesia can be considered early in the course of treatment of patients with chronic exposure to methadone who develop new or worsening pain requiring opioid therapy.