No abstract

No abstract

Abstract. Australia and most other countries are adopting renewable energy generation as the dominant means of reducing dependence on fossil fuels. This has been made more feasible by the exponential take-up of solar -photovoltaic (PV) systems and their concurrent production scale-up and cost decline. Rooftop solar PV, combined with battery storage, seems likely to be the dominant means of providing household electricity needs. In response to the technical challenges from rooftop PV, network utilities have implemented various low cost options to cope with PV's impact on network voltages. However, if we want this clean energy technology to fully utilise the available roof space and eventually meet residential electricity needs, additional hardware, control and commercial options will need to be adopted by both network utilities and their customers to overcome the technical barriers, especially voltage rise. This paper presents the authors' evaluations of options to mitigate voltage rise, including operating solar inverters with reactive power absorption (var absorbing), dependent only on solar power output or operating the solar inverters in a volt-var response mode (voltage droop control) where the inverter adjusts its reactive power (Q) in response to changes in its terminal voltage -Q(V). This paper also considers the fulltime Q(V) option, where an inverter's reactive power capacity is independent of solar conditions -statcom mode. The network utility option of using line drop compensation (LDC -used on long rural MV feeders) on urban MV feeders during daylight hours is assessed to lessen voltage rise on LV feeders with low net loading or reverse power flow due to high solar PV generation. The paper concludes that a combination of solar inverters performing fast fulltime voltage droop control outside a voltage deadband (statcom mode) and HV/MV substation transformers with slow acting daytime LDC mitigates voltage rise, whilst limiting feeder reactive power requirements.