IntroductionTo evaluate the effect of postoperative posture on the retinal shift after retinal detachment repair.MethodsPatients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) were included prospectively in the current study. Patients were randomized into two groups: group A included patients who did a log roll postoperatively, and group B included patients who had to lie flat on their backs for 6 h postoperatively before moving into the end position. Patients in group A and patients in group B were reviewed after 3 weeks and after 6 weeks, respectively, and fundus autofluorescence images (FAF) were obtained to visualize the retinal rotation.ResultsThe sample included 50 eyes from 49 patients. Retinal shift occurred after RRD repair in 17 patients (34%). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.94). Postoperative macular shift occurred significantly less often (p  = 0.049) in participants in whom heavy fluid was used in the procedure. Metamorphopsia was reported postoperatively by 10 of 17 patients with retinal shift (p < 0.001).ConclusionIn our study, postoperative posture did not significantly influence postoperative macular slippage after RRD repair. The use of intraoperative heavy liquid appears to be associated with a lower occurrence of retinal shift.

Thanks to the improvement in the surgical procedures, the ocular injuries with a metallic intraocular foreign body in the posterior segment as a result of hammering have a good visual outcome unless the macula is involved.

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose: To investigate clinical and surgical factors influencing the outcome after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery. Methods: A retrospective, single-centre, case-control study of 1017 eyes of 1017 consecutive patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), were included in the study. Analysed surgical factors were: combined procedure with phacoemulsification, type of retinopexy (cryocoagulation, endolaser, combined), type of tamponade (gas, silicone oil), and anatomical factors: primary proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and macular detachment at the time of surgery. Results: Overall retinal re-detachment rate was 10.1%. The main reason for re-detachment was an insufficient retinopexy in 53.6%, followed by PVR (37.3%), and retinal detachment occurred at a different location caused by another break in 9.1%. No significant difference in the rate of re-detachment was found if a phacoemulsification with simultaneous IOL implantation was performed (p = 0.641). No significant difference between the various retinopexy techniques was found (p = 0.309). Risk factors re-detachment were primary PVR (p = 0.0003), silicone oil as initial tamponade (p = 0.0001) as well as macula off detachments (p = 0.034). Conclusions: The present study showed no significant difference between the types of retinopexy and if additional phacoemulsification was performed or not. Factors associated with a higher risk for re-detachment were detached macula at surgery, primary PVR and primary oil-filling.