Historical and comparative methods comprise a diverse set of perspectives on and methodologies for examining temporality, including comparison, narrative, interpretive methods, and quantitative analysis. While many early sociologists used comparison implicitly, a more explicit comparative paradigm based on the work of Mill became influential in the late twentieth century for explaining historical causality. Critiques of these approaches led to a rise in narrative analyses, including process tracing and negative case analysis, which tend to emphasize process in explaining social change. Interpretive methods, including historical ethnography and oral history, provide tools for examining subjective meanings in historical context, including how they change over time. Finally, conventional quantitative methods, network methods, and content analysis can be used for formal analyses of history and structured comparison. Each methodology must be chosen to suit available data and specified carefully to avoid reification of the historical and causal dynamics under examination.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.