Background & Aims-Esophageal adenocarcinomas (EAC) are heterogeneous and often preceded by Barrett's esophagus (BE). Many genomic changes have been associated with development of BE and EAC, but little is known about epigenetic alterations. We performed *
PURPOSE A first-in-human study was performed with MP0250, a DARPin drug candidate. MP0250 specifically inhibits both vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) with the aim of disrupting the tumor microenvironment. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicenter, open-label, repeated-dose, phase I study was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of MP0250 in 45 patients with advanced solid tumors. In the dose-escalation part, 24 patients received MP0250 as a 3-hour infusion once every 2 weeks at five different dose levels (0.5-12 mg/kg). Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established, 21 patients were treated with a 1-hour infusion (n = 13, 8 mg/kg, once every 2 weeks and n = 8, 12 mg/kg, once every 3 weeks) of MP0250 in the dose confirmation cohorts. RESULTS In the dose-escalation cohort, patients treated with 12 mg/kg MP0250 once every 2 weeks experienced dose-limiting toxicities. Therefore, MTD was 8 mg/kg once every 2 weeks or 12 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. The most common adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (69%), proteinuria (51%), and diarrhea and nausea (both 36%); hypoalbuminemia was reported in 24% of patients. Most AEs were consistent with inhibition of the VEGF and HGF pathways. Exposure was dose-proportional and sustained throughout the dosing period for all patients (up to 15 months). The half-life was about 2 weeks. Signs of single-agent antitumor activity were observed: 1 unconfirmed partial response with a time to progression of 23 weeks and 24 patients with stable disease, with the longest duration of 72 weeks and a median duration of 18 weeks. CONCLUSION MP0250 is a first-in-class DARPin drug candidate with suitable tolerability and appropriate pharmacokinetic properties for further development in combination with other anticancer therapies.
BRCA testing has experienced a sixfold increase, the number of relatives being tested has doubled, and the test is being performed at earlier phases of the disease. It is necessary to adequate the health resources to preserve the BRCA genetic counseling quality while incorporating BRCA testing for therapeutic decision making.
Purpose: The strategy of combining endocrine therapy with PI3K-mTOR inhibition has shown promise in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, but new agents and combinations with a better therapeutic index are urgently needed. Taselisib is a potent, selective, beta-isoform-sparing PI3 kinase inhibitor.Patients and Methods: 30 patients with ER-positive, metastatic breast cancer who had failed prior endocrine therapy were treated with escalating doses of taselisib (2 or 4 mg in an intermittent or continuous schedule) combined with tamoxifen 20 mg once daily in this phase 1b study using a "rolling six" design.Results: Taselisib combined with tamoxifen was generally well tolerated, with treatment-emergent adverse events as expected for this class of drugs, including diarrhea (13 patients, 43%), mucositis (10 patients, 33%), and hypergly-cemia (8 patients, 27%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Objective responses were seen in 6 of 25 patients with RECIST-measurable disease (ORR 24%). Median time to disease progression was 3.7 months. Twelve of 30 patients (40%) had disease control for 6 months or more. Circulating tumor (ct)DNA studies using next-generation tagged amplicon sequencing identified early indications of treatment response and mechanistically relevant correlates of clinical drug resistance (e.g., mutations in KRAS, ERBB2) in some patients.Conclusions: Taselisib can be safely combined with tamoxifen at the recommended phase 2 dose of 4 mg given once daily on a continuous schedule. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was seen in both PIK3CA mutant and wild-type cancers. The randomized phase 2 part of POSEIDON (testing tamoxifen plus taselisib or placebo) is currently recruiting.
2008 Background: Failure of drugs to cross the blood brain barrier (BBB) can be a major reason for treatment failure in pts with brain tumours. Preliminary data suggest that low-dose RT may disrupt the BBB, and could facilitate increased drug delivery into brain tumours. CamBMT1 is a phase 1b/2 pre-operative window-of-opportunity trial designed to test if the delivery of afatinib into brain mets might be enhanced by targeted, low dose-RT. Methods: Pts with operable brain mets from breast or lung origin were treated with afatinib for 11 days prior to surgery on day 12. Pts also received a single fraction of targeted RT on day 10 (pts in either 2Gy or 4Gy arm). In phase 1b, afatinib dose (20, 30, or 40mg QD) was escalated in each arm using an accelerated titration design. Primary endpoint: steady-state afatinib concentration in resected brain mets, compared with plasma. Secondary endpoints: safety and tolerability. Results: 10 pts were treated (4 breast, 6 lung), with no dose-limiting toxicities seen, thus completing recruitment to phase 1b. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Median afatinib concentrations on day 12 were: plasma 22.7ng/mL (range 9.94-179); and tumour 405ng/g (range 120-1129). Conclusions: It was feasible to conduct a window-of-opportunity study of afatinib plus RT in pts with operable brain mets. The recommended phase 2 dose of afatinib was 40mg QD for both 2Gy and 4Gy arms. Afatinib concentrations in resected tumour were on average >15-fold higher than those in plasma. Phase 2 of CamBMT1 is now underway in multiple UK sites, and randomises patients into 3 treatment arms (n=20 per arm): 1. afatinib 40mg QD; 2. afatinib 40mg QD + 2Gy# RT; 3. afatinib 40mg QD + 4Gy# RT. Clinical trial information: NCT02768337. [Table: see text]
Results: After inclusion of 24 patients, an interim analysis was performed and the study was terminated due to slow patient accrual and lack of clinical benefit. MP yielded informative results from 20 patients (83%), a potential tumor-specific drug could be matched in 11 out of 24 patients (46%) and eight patients (33%) received a matched treatment. Median PFS in the matched treatment group was 61.5 days (IQR 49.8-71.0) compared to 81.5 days ) for the last evidence-based treatment, resulting in a median PFS ratio of 0.7 (IQR 0.6-0.9). Whereas databasebased molecular profiling matching suggested mainly single drugs, the retrospective CureMatch analysis identified either a 2-drug or 3-drug combination option in each of the tested cases, including a case for which no therapy was previously identified.Conclusions: This study is first to report prospective outcome results on the efficacy of plasma DNA profiling-based treatment, but it challenges the routine use of this procedure for treatment selection in advanced cancer patients outside of clinical trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.