Nalmefene, the 6-methylene derivative of naltrexone, was examined after subcutaneous (s.c.) (0.0001 to 8.0 mg/kg) and oral (10 to 80.0 mg/kg) administration in ethanol (EtOH)-preferring rats whose responding (i.e., lever pressing) was maintained by the presentation of EtOH. Naltrexone (0.01 to 40 mg/kg) was used as a reference opioid antagonist. EtOH (10% v/v) and saccharin (0.025 to 0.1% w/v) solutions were concurrently available for 1 hr each day under a two-lever, fixed-ratio schedule in which four responses on one lever produced the EtOH solution and four responses on the other lever produced the saccharin solution. When basal response rates for saccharin were 10% that of EtOH, all routes of nalmefene administration reduced control levels of responding maintained by EtOH by 38 to 84%. When basal response rates for saccharin-maintained responding were 60% or 82% that of EtOH, only lower s.c. naltrexone (e.g., 0.01 to 0.025 mg/kg) and nalmefene (e.g., 0.01 to 0.10 mg/kg) doses produced a selective dose-dependent suppression of EtOH-maintained responding. Higher nalmefene (0.25 to 8.0 mg/kg) and naltrexone (1.0 to 20.0 mg/kg) doses failed to produce a dose-dependent suppression on EtOH or saccharin maintained responding. Both antagonists suppressed responding maintained by EtOH primarily during the initial 10-min period, with little additional suppression occurring across the remainder of the 60-min period. Subcutaneous nalmefene was 3200- to 6400-fold more potent than oral nalmefene, suggesting bioavailability was optimized using the s.c. route. Nalmefene (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.) treatment for 10 consecutive days produced mild tolerance development, whose effects dissipated by day 8. Naltrexone (10 to 40 mg/kg) and nalmefene (1.5 to 3.0 mg/kg), given 8 to 24 hr before the test session, reduced control levels of responding maintained by EtOH by 82%. Thus, immediate opioid receptor occupancy was not required to observe antagonism. These data demonstrate that, under a variety of experimental conditions, nalmefene is an effective antagonist of responding maintained by EtOH and lend support to clinical reports that nalmefene may function as an alternative pharmacotherapy to naltrexone to reduce EtOH-motivated behavior and prevent relapse.

No abstract

Nalmefene, the 6-methylene derivative of naltrexone, was examined after subcutaneous (s.c.) (0.0001 to 8.0 mg/kg) and oral (10 to 80.0 mg/kg) administration in ethanol (EtOH)-preferring rats whose responding (i.e., lever pressing) was maintained by the presentation of EtOH. Naltrexone (0.01 to 40 mg/kg) was used as a reference opioid antagonist. EtOH (10% v/v) and saccharin (0.025 to 0.1% w/v) solutions were concurrently available for 1 hr each day under a two-lever, fixed-ratio schedule in which four responses on one lever produced the EtOH solution and four responses on the other lever produced the saccharin solution. When basal response rates for saccharin were 10% that of EtOH, all routes of nalmefene administration reduced control levels of responding maintained by EtOH by 38 to 84%. When basal response rates for saccharin-maintained responding were 60% or 82% that of EtOH, only lower s.c. naltrexone (e.g., 0.01 to 0.025 mg/kg) and nalmefene (e.g., 0.01 to 0.10 mg/kg) doses produced a selective dose-dependent suppression of EtOH-maintained responding. Higher nalmefene (0.25 to 8.0 mg/kg) and naltrexone (1.0 to 20.0 mg/kg) doses failed to produce a dose-dependent suppression on EtOH or saccharin maintained responding. Both antagonists suppressed responding maintained by EtOH primarily during the initial 10-min period, with little additional suppression occurring across the remainder of the 60-min period. Subcutaneous nalmefene was 3200- to 6400-fold more potent than oral nalmefene, suggesting bioavailability was optimized using the s.c. route. Nalmefene (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.) treatment for 10 consecutive days produced mild tolerance development, whose effects dissipated by day 8. Naltrexone (10 to 40 mg/kg) and nalmefene (1.5 to 3.0 mg/kg), given 8 to 24 hr before the test session, reduced control levels of responding maintained by EtOH by 82%. Thus, immediate opioid receptor occupancy was not required to observe antagonism. These data demonstrate that, under a variety of experimental conditions, nalmefene is an effective antagonist of responding maintained by EtOH and lend support to clinical reports that nalmefene may function as an alternative pharmacotherapy to naltrexone to reduce EtOH-motivated behavior and prevent relapse.