Introduction Pulmonary embolism (PE) can be difficult to rule out without computed tomography pulmonary angiograms (CTPAs), as presentations vary. Multiple clinical decision rules (CDRs) exist to risk-stratify patients to avoid unnecessary CTPAs. However, the currently used CDRs are complex, and research has shown low compliance with their usage. The YEARS algorithm is less complex and excludes patients from CTPA if PE is not the most likely diagnosis, they do not have a history of hemoptysis, and no clinical signs of deep vein thrombosis, is less complex. However, no studies have evaluated YEARS in the U.S. Military health care beneficiary population. Therefore, this study sought to determine if implementing the YEARS algorithm could decrease the number of CTPAs ordered to rule out PE in low-risk patients. Methods This retrospective, single-center cohort study applied the YEARS algorithm to low-risk military beneficiaries presenting to the emergency department in the calendar year 2020 at a single U.S. Army MTF. The primary outcome was the number of CTPAs indicated by the YEARS algorithm versus the number ordered via standard practice. We used chi-square testing to compare the number of subjects in whom YEARS indicated CTPA (meets criteria/does not meet criteria) versus the actual number of subjects who underwent CTPA (meets criteria/does not meet criteria). The secondary outcomes included applying YEARS similarly to the number of subjects >50 years of age (as opposed to age-adjusted d-dimer), determining the number of pregnant patients who could have avoided CTPA via application of YEARS, and assessing possible cost savings via reduction of CTPA. Results We included 353 subjects during the study period, 271 of whom underwent CTPA. YEARS would have only indicated 25 of them, P = .018. In patients >50 years of age, 164 underwent CTPA versus nine who met YEARS criteria, P = .014. Among pregnant patients, six underwent CTPA versus one who YEARS would have indicated, P = .130. Application of the YEARS algorithm would have led to a 90.8% reduction in CTPAs ordered with an overall known missed PE rate of 1.1%. Applying the YEARS algorithm in 2020 could have led to 246 fewer CTPAs at a minimum cost savings of $38,762.22 for the MTF based on the coded billing cost of $157.57 per CTPA when local staff radiologists performed image interpretation. This estimate does not consider the additional undisclosed cost of contracted radiologists interpreting after regular duty hours. Conclusions For our military beneficiaries, our study indicates that the YEARS algorithm would have reduced CTPA utilization in all age ranges and potentially among pregnant patients with a known missed PE rate of 1.1%.
We report the case of a 37-year-old man presenting with pain out of proportion to the exam with hydrofluoric acid burns to his upper extremities after he spilled a wheel-stripping compound on his forearms while working at his powder coating business. His burns initially appeared mild and superficial, but over the course of several days, these evolved from simple erythema to significant partial thickness tissue destruction and ulceration. He required substantial topical, intradermal, and intravenous therapies to control the unseen burning process during his index visit to the emergency department. We transferred the patient to a burn center given the location of his burns and the causative agent. The burn center clinicians observed him over the course of two nights and then discharged him with instructions to come for multiple follow-up visits during the subsequent month. Following nonoperative management, he had an uneventful recovery with full function retained in the affected extremities. Hydrofluoric acid burns require prompt treatment with calcium to neutralize the burning process, despite a potentially benign initial appearance. The emergency clinician should use an aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic approach to patients presenting with pain out of proportion to their exam, as this finding is associated with various serious underlying pathology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.