Background and purpose Treatment options for stroke related dysphagia are currently limited. In this study we investigated whether non-invasive brain stimulation in combination with swallowing maneuvers facilitates swallowing recovery in dysphagic stroke patients during early stroke convalescence. Methods Fourteen patients with subacute unilateral hemispheric infarction were randomized to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) versus sham stimulation to the sensorimotor cortical representation of swallowing in the unaffected hemisphere over 5 consecutive days with concurrent standardized swallowing maneuvers. Severity of dysphagia was measured using a validated swallowing scale, Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS), before the first and after the last session of tDCS or sham. The effect of tDCS was analyzed in a multivariate linear regression model using changes in DOSS as the outcome variable, after adjusting for the effects of other potential confounding variables such as the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and DOSS scores at baseline, acute ischemic lesion volumes, patient’s age and time from stroke onset to stimulation. Results Patients who received anodal tDCS gained 2.60 points improvement in DOSS scores compared to patients in the sham stimulation group who showed an improvement of 1.25 points (P=0.019) after controlling for the effects of other aforementioned variables. 6 out 7 (86%) patients in tDCS stimulation group gained at least 2 points improvement compared with 3 out 7 (43%) patients in sham group (P=0.107). Conclusion Since brainstem swallowing centers have bilateral cortical innervations, measures that enhance cortical input and sensorimotor control of brainstem swallowing may be beneficial for dysphagia recovery.
Background: Pneumonia is a major complication of stroke, but effective prevention strategies are lacking. Since aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions is the primary mechanism for development of stroke-associated pneumonia, strategies that decrease oral colonization with pathogenic bacteria may help curtail pneumonia risk. We therefore hypothesized that systematic oral care protocols can help decrease pneumonia risk in hospitalized stroke patients. In this study, we investigated the impact of a systematic oral hygiene care (OHC) program in reducing hospital-acquired pneumonia in patients with acute-subacute stroke. Methods: This study compared the proportion of pneumonia cases in hospitalized stroke patients before and after implementation of a systematic OHC intervention. All patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage admitted to a large, urban academic medical center in Boston, Mass., USA from May 31, 2008, to June 1, 2010 (epoch prior to implementation of OHC), and from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2013 (epoch after full implementation of OHC), who were 18 years of age and hospitalized for ≥2 days were eligible for inclusion. The cohort in the first epoch constituted the control group whereas the cohort in the second epoch formed the intervention group. Multivariate logistic regression was used to control for confounders. The main outcome measure was hospital-acquired pneumonia, defined via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Results: The cohort comprised 1,656 admissions (707 formed historical controls; 949 were in the intervention group). The unadjusted incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia was lower in the group assigned to OHC compared to controls (14 vs. 10.33%; p = 0.022) with an unadjusted OR of 0.68 (95% CI 0.48-0.95; p = 0.022). After adjustment for influential confounders, the OR of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the intervention group remained significantly lower at 0.71 (95% CI 0.51-0.98; p = 0.041). Conclusion: In this large hospital-based cohort of patients admitted with acute stroke, systematic OHC use was associated with decreased odds of hospital-acquired pneumonia.
This study investigated the influence of age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, time from stroke onset, infarct location and volume in predicting placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube in patients with severe dysphagia from an acute-subacute hemispheric infarction. We performed a retrospective analysis of a hospital-based patient cohort to analyze the effect of the aforementioned variables on the decision of whether or not to place a PEG tube. Consecutive patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes for acute ischemic stroke, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT)-4 codes for a formal swallowing evaluation by a speech pathologist, and procedure codes for PEG placement over a 5-year period from existing medical records at our institution. Only patients with severe dysphagia were enrolled. A total of 77 patients met inclusion criteria; 20 of them underwent PEG placement. The relationship between age (dichotomized; < and ≥75 years), time from stroke onset (days), NIHSS score, acute infarct lesion volume (dichotomized; < and ≥100 cc), and infarct location (ie, insula, anterior insula, periventricular white matter, inferior frontal gyrus, motor cortex, or bilateral hemispheres) with PEG tube placement were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. In univariate analysis, NIHSS score (P =.005), lesion volume (P =.022), and presence of bihemispheric infarction (P =.005) were found to be the main predictors of interest. After multivariate adjustment, only NIHSS score (odds ratio [OR], 1.15; 90% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.29; P = .04) and presence of bihemispheric infarcts (OR, 4.67; 90% CI, 1.58–13.75; P =.018) remained significant. Our data indicates that baseline NIHSS score and the presence of bihemispheric infarcts predict PEG placement during hospitalization from an acute-subacute hemispheric infarction in patients with severe dysphagia. These results require further validation in future studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.