Objective-To determine whether transthoracic three dimensional echocardiography is an accurate non-invasive technique for defining the morphology of atrial septal defects (ASD). Methods-In 34 patients with secundum ASD, mean (SD) age 20 (17) years (14 male, 20 female), the measurements obtained from three dimensional echocardiography were compared to those obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or surgery. Three dimensional images were constructed to simulate the ASD view as seen by a surgeon. Measured variables were: maximum and minimum vertical and horizontal ASD dimension, and distances to inferior and superior vena cava, coronary sinus, and tricuspid valve. In each patient two ultrasound techniques were used to acquire three dimensional data: standard grey scale imaging (GSI) and Doppler myocardial imaging (DMI). Results-Good correlation was found in maximum ASD dimension (both horizontal and vertical) between three dimensional echocardiography and both MRI (GSI r = 0.96, SEE = 0.05 cm; DMI r = 0.97, SEE = 0.04 cm) and surgery (GSI r = 0.92, SEE = 0.06 cm; DMI r = 0.95, SEE = 0.06 cm). The systematic error was similar for both three dimensional techniques when compared to both MRI (GSI = 0.40 cm (27%); DMI = 0.38 cm (25%)) and surgery (GSI = 0.50 cm (29%); DMI = 0.37 cm (22%)). A significant diVerence was found in both horizontal and vertical ASD dimension changes during the cardiac cycle. This change was inversely correlated with age. These findings were consistent for both DMI and GSI technique. In children (age < 17 years), the feasibility of detecting structures and undertaking measurements was similar for both echo techniques. However, in adult ASD patients (age > 18 years) this feasibility was higher for DMI than for GSI. Conclusions-Transthoracic three dimensional imaging using both GSI and DMI accurately displayed the varying morphology, dimensions, and spatial relations of ASD. However, DMI was a more eVective technique than GSI in describing ASD morphology in adults.
In a prospective study, spiral-acquisition computed tomography (SACT) of the thorax was evaluated in 104 patients with extrathoracic malignancy and suspected pulmonary metastases, and was directly compared with conventional computed tomography (CCT) in 23 patients. The following parameters were assessed: lesion detectability; the effect on lesion detectability of reconstruction of scans at 5 mm and 10 mm slice increments; breathing artefact and slice misregistration. The radiation dose of the two techniques was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters placed within an anthropomorphic chest phantom, and the visibility of simulated metastases inserted into the phantom was also compared using CCT, standard SACT and SACT with pitch greater than 1.0. Where metastases were present, SACT scans showed significantly better lesion detectability than CCT scans (p < 0.001). Image reconstruction of SACT data at 5 mm increments conferred no significant advantage in lesion detectability over 10 mm increment reconstructions. Compared with CCT, SACT scans showed reduced breathing artefact, and a complete absence of slice misregistration (p < 0.01). Phantom measurements of radiation dose and resolution were similar for both techniques. Increasing the pitch of the spiral in SACT caused only a small decrease in phantom resolution, but with the advantage of a reduction in the radiation dose. Spiral-acquisition CT is superior to conventional CT for the assessment of pulmonary metastatic disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.