Interleukin-33 (IL-33) and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) are alarmins that are released upon airway epithelial injury from insults such as viruses and cigarette smoke, and play critical roles in the activation of immune cell populations such as mast cells, eosinophils and group 2 innate lymphoid cells. Both cytokines were previously understood to primarily drive type 2 (T2) inflammation, but there is emerging evidence for a role for these alarmins to additionally mediate non-T2 inflammation, with recent clinical trial data in asthma and COPD cohorts with non-T2 inflammation providing support. Currently available treatments for both COPD and asthma provide symptomatic relief with disease control, improving lung function and reducing exacerbation rates; however, there still remains an unmet need for further improving lung function and reducing exacerbations, particularly for those not responsive to currently available treatments. The epithelial cytokines/alarmins are involved in exacerbations; biologics targeting TSLP and IL-33 have been shown to reduce exacerbations in moderate-to-severe asthma, either in a broad population or in specific subgroups, respectively. For COPD, while there is clinical evidence for IL-33 blockade impacting exacerbations in COPD, clinical data from anti-TSLP therapies is awaited. Clinical data to date support an acceptable safety profile for patients with airway diseases for both anti-IL-33 and anti-TSLP antibodies in development. We examine the roles of IL-33 and TSLP, their potential use as drug targets, and the evidence for target patient populations for COPD and asthma, together with ongoing and future trials focused on these targets.

Introduction Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global public health threat, with approximately 257 million people suffering from chronic HBV infection worldwide in 2015. HBV reactivation is a known complication of immunosuppressive therapy in people suffering with chronic HBV. Medications commonly associated with HBV reactivation include B-cell depleting agents and anthracycline derivatives. There have been very few documented cases of chemoradiation inducing HBV reactivation among scientific literature. Case report A 44-year-old woman with chronic HBV infection and [FIGO] stage IIIB cervical cancer developed marked transaminitis and increased HBV viral load after receiving treatment with three doses of cisplatin and one dose of carboplatin with concurrent radiation for cervical cancer. Management and outcome: The patient was admitted for acute liver failure and quickly developed encephalopathy, with treatment complicated by coagulopathy, hypoglycemia, and metabolic acidosis. The patient remained unresponsive to maximal therapeutic efforts and was mechanically ventilated for airway protection. She subsequently died after experiencing ventricular tachycardia followed by asystole. Discussion There are currently no standardized guidelines for the screening of HBV infection or prophylaxis treatment algorithm for patients undergoing chemoradiation. When initiating treatment with immunosuppressive therapy, it is important to screen all patients for chronic HBV infection and to work with an interdisciplinary team of oncologists, hepatologists, and pharmacists to initiate prophylactic antiviral therapy and closely monitor to minimize the risk of HBV reactivation.

Prior-year exacerbation history is the best predictor of future exacerbations and forms part of the global clinical guidelines for management of COPD patients. Frequent exacerbators (FEs) are patients who have >=2 moderate-to-severe exacerbations in a year. They have a high risk of poor outcomes and may benefit from close monitoring and therapeutic interventions. Clinical trials of novel COPD treatments that reduce exacerbations also select for patients who meet the FE definition. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the COPD exacerbation rate has declined dramatically, complicating the use of prior-year exacerbation frequency for identifying FEs. An alternate approach is to extend the observation period from one to two previous years; however, the impact of this change on the prognostic value of exacerbation history is not well understood. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of FEs in subsequent years when a two-year vs. one-year exacerbation history is used to identify FEs.