Pain is a diverse sensory and emotional experience that likely involves activation of numerous regions of the brain. Yet, many of these areas are also implicated in the processing of nonpainful somatosensory information. In order to better characterize the processing of pain within the human brain, activation produced by noxious stimuli was compared with that produced by robust innocuous stimuli. Painful heat (47-48 degrees C), nonpainful vibratory (110 Hz), and neutral control (34 degrees C) stimuli were applied to the left forearm of right-handed male subjects. Activation of regions within the diencephalon and telencephalon was evaluated by measuring regional cerebral blood flow using positron emission tomography (15O-water-bolus method). Painful stimulation produced contralateral activation in primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (SI and SII), anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, the supplemental motor area of the frontal cortex, and thalamus. Vibrotactile stimulation produced activation in contralateral SI, and bilaterally in SII and posterior insular cortices. A direct comparison of pain and vibrotactile stimulation revealed that both stimuli produced activation in similar regions of SI and SII, regions long thought to be involved in basic somatosensory processing. In contrast, painful stimuli were significantly more effective in activating the anterior insula, a region heavily linked with both somatosensory and limbic systems. Such connections may provide one route through which nociceptive input may be integrated with memory in order to allow a full appreciation of the meaning and dangers of painful stimuli. These data reveal that pain-related activation, although predominantly contralateral in distribution, is more widely dispersed across both cortical and thalamic regions than that produced during innocuous vibrotactile stimulation. This distributed cerebral activation reflects the complex nature of pain, involving discriminative, affective, autonomic, and motoric components. Furthermore, the high degree of interconnectivity among activated regions may account for the difficulty of eliminating pathological pain with discrete CNS lesions.

Pain is an individual experience. Previous studies have highlighted changes in brain activation and morphology associated with within- and interindividual pain perception. In this study we sought to characterize brain mechanisms associated with between-individual differences in pain in a sample of healthy adolescent and adult participants (N = 101). Here we show that pain ratings varied widely across individuals and that individuals reported changes in pain evoked by small differences in stimulus intensity in a manner congruent with their pain sensitivity, further supporting the utility of subjective reporting as a measure of the true individual experience. Furthermore, brain activation related to interindividual differences in pain was not detected, despite clear sensitivity of the Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent (BOLD) signal to small differences in noxious stimulus intensities within individuals. These findings suggest fMRI may not be a useful objective measure to infer reported pain intensity.

Adolescents with migraine have different functional connectivity of the amygdala compared to individuals without migraine. Considering that sleep is often disturbed in those adolescents with migrane, this study examined if measures of subjective and objective (actigraphic) sleep difficulties mediate alterations in amygdalar connectivity in adolescents with migraine compared to healthy adolescents. Twenty adolescents with migraine and 20 healthy controls completed surveys about their headaches and overall sleep quality, sleep hygiene and perceived sleep difficulties, wore a wrist-worn actigraphy, and underwent an MRI scan. Adolescents with migraine differed from healthy controls only in perceived sleep difficulties related to sleep initiation and maintenance (p <0.01) andhad greater functional connectivity between the amygdala and the posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, dorsolateral prefrontal, sensorimotor, and the occipital cortexes. While the mediation model showed group differences in subjective and actigraphic sleep difficulties, these did not mediate the differences in amygdalar connectivity found between the groups. Adolescents with migraine have greater connectivity between the amygdala and areas involved in sensory, affective, and cognitive aspects of pain. These alterations may not be due to higher levels of sleep difficulties in adolescents with migraine, suggesting that both amygdala and sleep alterations may play an independent role in migraine pathophysiology

Adolescence is a sensitive period for both brain development and the emergence of chronic pain particularly in females. However, the brain mechanisms supporting pain perception during adolescence remain unclear. This study compares perceptual and brain responses to pain in female adolescents and adults to characterize pain processing in the developing pain. Thirty adolescent (ages 13-17) and thirty adult (ages 35-55) females underwent a functional MRI scan involving acute experimental pain. Participants received 12 ten-second noxious pressure stimuli, which were applied to the left thumbnail at 2.5 and 4 kg/cm2, and rated pain intensity and unpleasantness on a visual analogue scale. We found a significant group-by-stimulus intensity interaction on pain ratings. Compared to adults, adolescents reported greater pain intensity and unpleasantness in response to 2.5 kg/cm2, but not 4 kg/cm2. Adolescents showed greater medial-lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) and supramarginal gyrus activation in response to 2.5 kg/cm2, and greater medial PFC and rostral anterior cingulate responses to 4 kg/cm2. Adolescents showed augmented pain-evoked responses in the Neurologic Pain Signature and greater activation in the default mode (DMN) and ventral attention (VAN) networks. Also, the amygdala and associated regions played a stronger role in predicting pain intensity in adolescents, and activity in DMN and VAN regions more strongly mediated the relationship between stimulus intensity and pain ratings. This study provides the first evidence of augmented pain-evoked brain responses in healthy female adolescents involving regions important for nociceptive, affective and cognitive processing, in line with their augmented sensitivity to low-intensity noxious stimuli.