Highlights d Integrated omics method identifies non-canonical and undocumented protein isoforms d Widespread isoform shifts during human iPSC cardiomyocyte differentiation d Unidentified protein isoforms recoverable from 80 million public mass spectra d Isoform sequences overlap with intrinsically disordered regions and PTM sites
Identifying the genes and proteins associated with a biological process or disease is a central goal of the biomedical research enterprise. However, relatively few systematic approaches are available that provide objective evaluation of the genes or proteins known to be important to a research topic, and hence researchers often rely on subjective evaluation of domain experts and laborious manual literature review. Computational bibliometric analysis, in conjunction with text mining and data curation, attempts to automate this process and return prioritized proteins in any given research topic. We describe here a method to identify and rank protein—topic relationships by calculating the semantic similarity between a protein and a query term in the biomerical literature while adjusting for the impact and immediacy of associated research articles. We term the calculated metric the weighted copublication distance (WCD) and show that it compares well to related approaches in predicting benchmark protein lists in multiple biological processes. We used WCD to extract prioritized “popular proteins” across multiple cell types, subanatomical regions, and standardized vocabularies containing over 20 000 human disease terms. The collection of protein—disease associations across the resulting human “diseasome” supports data analytical workflows to perform reverse protein-to-disease queries and functional annotation of experimental protein lists. We envision that the described improvement to the popular proteins strategy will be useful for annotating protein lists and guiding method development efforts as well as generating new hypotheses on understudied disease proteins using bibliometric information.
We performed total RNA sequencing and multi-omics analysis comparing skeletal muscle and cardiac muscle in young adult (4 months) vs. early aging (20 months) mice to examine the molecular mechanisms...
The heart is sensitive to oxidative damage but a global view on how the cardiac proteome responds to oxidative stressors has yet to fully emerge. Using quantitative tandem mass spectrometry, we assessed the effects of acute exposure of the oxidative stress inducer paraquat on protein expression in mouse hearts. We observed widespread protein expression changes in the paraquat-exposed heart especially in organelle-containing subcellular fractions. During cardiac response to acute oxidative stress, proteome changes are consistent with a rapid reduction of mitochondrial metabolism, coupled with activation of multiple antioxidant proteins, reduction of protein synthesis and remediation of proteostasis. In addition to differential expression, we saw evidence of spatial reorganizations of the cardiac proteome including the translocation of hexokinase 2 to more soluble fractions. Treatment with the antioxidants Tempol and MitoTEMPO reversed many proteomic signatures of paraquat but this reversal was incomplete. We also identified a number of proteins with unknown function in the heart to be triggered by paraquat, suggesting they may have functions in oxidative stress response. Surprisingly, protein expression changes in the heart correlate poorly with those in the lung, consistent with differential sensitivity or stress response in these two organs. The results and data set here could provide insights into oxidative stress responses in the heart and avail the search for new therapeutic targets.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.