Enteric drainage in pancreas transplantation is complicated by an enteric leak in 5%–8%, frequently necessitating pancreatectomy. Pancreatic salvage outcomes are not well studied. Risk factors for enteric leak were examined and outcomes of attempted graft salvage were compared to immediate pancreatectomy. Pancreas transplants performed between 1995 and 2018 were reviewed. Donor, recipient, and organ variables including demographics, donor type, ischemic time, kidney donor profile index, and pancreas donor risk index were analyzed. Among 1153 patients, 33 experienced enteric leaks (2.9%). Donors of allografts that developed leak were older (37.9y vs. 29.0y, p = .001), had higher KDPI (37% vs. 24%, p < .001), higher pancreas donor risk index (1.83 vs. 1.32, p < .001), and longer cold ischemic time (16.5 vs. 14.8 h, p = .03). Intra‐abdominal abscess and higher blood loss decreased the chance of successful salvage. Enteric leak increased 6‐month graft loss risk (HR 13.9[CI 8.5–22.9], p < .001). However, 50% (n = 12) of allografts undergoing attempted salvage survived long‐term. After 6 months of pancreas graft survival, salvage and non‐leak groups had similar 5‐year graft survival (82.5% vs. 81.5%) and mortality (90.9% vs. 93.5%). Enteric leaks remain a challenging complication. Pancreatic allograft salvage can be attempted in suitable patients and accomplished in 50% of cases without significantly increased graft failure or mortality risk.
Background: This study describes the use of transversus abdominis plane (TAP)
blocks to treat and manage chronic abdominal pain (CAP) in patients who have
exhausted other treatment options. Typically, this is a procedure prescribed for
treating acute abdominal pain following abdominal surgery. Here we evaluate the
use of TAP blocks for longer relief from CAP.
Objectives: To assess the efficacy of TAP blocks for pain control in patients with
CAP.
Study Design: This was a retrospective chart review and analysis of TAP blocks
performed over 5 years. This project qualified for institutional review board exemption.
Setting: This study was completed at an academic institution.
Methods: We reviewed the charts of 92 patients who received TAP blocks for
CAP after previous treatment was ineffective. Some patients underwent multiple
TAP blocks, with a total of 163 individual procedures identified. For most blocks, a
solution of 0.25% bupivacaine and triamcinolone was injected into the TAP. Efficacy
of the injection was measured using pain scores, percent improvement, and duration
of relief from pain.
Results: TAP blocks were associated with a statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05)
improvement in abdominal pain scores in 81.9% of procedures. Improvement was
50.3% ± 39.0% with an average duration of 108 days after procedures with ongoing
pain relief at time of follow-up were removed. There was a significant reduction in
emergency department visits for abdominal pain before and after the procedure (P
≤ 0.05).
Limitations: This was a retrospective chart review with lack of a control group.
Conclusions: TAP blocks can be extrapolated for treating abdominal pain beyond
acute settings. TAP injections can be considered as a treatment option for patients
with somatosensory CAP refractory to other forms of pain management.
Key words: Abdominal pain, transversus abdominis plane block, chronic pain,
chronic abdominal pain, pain management, somatosensory pain, transversus
abdominis plane, steroid injection
Background:
A Chance fracture is a traumatic fracture of the thoracic or lumbar spine that occurs secondary to a flexion-distraction injury. Although patients with chance fractures rarely present with neurologic deficits, a subset may become symptomatic from spinal epidural hematomas (SEH) warranting emergent decompressive surgery.
Case Description:
An 87-year-old female on anticoagulation presented with a T1 Chance fracture after a fall. She was originally neurologically intact, but became paraplegic over the next 10 h. When the cervical/thoracic magnetic resonance revealed a SEH markedly compressing the cord between the C7-T1 levels, she underwent an emergent decompression; she also had a C5-T4 instrumented fusion. Postoperatively, she regained lower limb function, but expired on postoperative day 5 due to respiratory complications likely attributed to the prolonged surgery for the spinal instrumentation.
Conclusion:
Delayed SEH rarely occur following spinal Chance fractures. Here, an 87-year-old female on anticoagulation developed the 10-h delayed onset of a SEH with paraplegia attributed to a T1 Chance fracture at the C7-T1 level. Although she regained neurological function following the emergent decompression, she expired 5 days later likely due to the extended operative time/blood loss from the C5-T4 fusion that could have been avoided.
BACKGROUND
Noonan syndrome (NS) is a rare genetic RASopathy with multisystem implications. The disorder is typically characterized by short stature, distinctive facial features, intellectual disability, developmental delay, chest deformity, and congenital heart disease. NS may be inherited or arise secondary to spontaneous mutations of genes in the Ras/mitogen activated protein kinase signaling pathways.
OBSERVATIONS
Numerous case reports exist detailing the association between NS and Chiari I malformation (CM-I), although this relationship has not been fully established. Patients with NS who present with CM-I requiring operation have shown high rates reoperation for failed decompression. The authors reported two patients with NS, CM-I, and syringomyelia who had prior posterior fossa decompressions without syrinx improvement. Both patients received reoperation with successful outcomes.
LESSONS
The authors highlighted the association between NS and CM-I and raised awareness that patients with these disorders may be at higher risk for failed posterior fossa decompression, necessitating reoperation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.