Current methods to diagnose concussions are subjective and difficult to confirm. A variety of physiological biomarkers have been reported, but with conflicting results. This study assessed heart rate variability (HRV), spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), and systolic blood pressure variability (BPV) in concussed athletes. The assessment consisted of a 5-min seated rest followed by a 5-min (0.1 Hz) controlled breathing protocol. Thirty participants completed baseline assessments. The protocol was repeated during the post-injury acute phase (days one to five). Total (p = 0.02) and low-frequency (p = 0.009) BPV spectral power were significantly decreased during the acute phase of concussion. BRS down-sequence (p = 0.036) and up-sequence (p = 0.05) were significantly increased in the acute phase of concussion, with a trend towards an increased BRS pooled (p = 0.06). Significant decreases in HRV were also found. Acute concussion resulted in altered BRS and BPV dynamics compared to baseline. These findings highlight objective physiological parameters that could aid concussion diagnosis and return-to-play protocols.

No abstract

Cardiac cycle timing events in varsity athletes serve an important function for baseline assessment but are not reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to characterise the cardiac cycle timing intervals and contractility parameters in university-level varsity athletes. 152 males and 93 females were assessed using a non-invasive seismocardiography cardiac sensor attached to the sternum for 1-minute. Shorter isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), systolic time, mitral valve open to E-wave (MVO to E) time, rapid ejection period (REP), atrial systole to mitral valve closure (AS to MVC) time, and diastolic performance index (IVRT/systolic time) were found in females, while heart rate was lower in males. Varying differences in timing intervals were found between sports. Systolic times were longer in male and female basketball players, while diastole was shortest in male football players, who also had higher heart rates than the other male sport athletes. These results add reference cardiac cycle timing data to the literature and imply that male and female athletes show different cardiac characteristics. Team differences suggest that different training for different sports can result in unique cardiac function changes, however, these appear to be related to the sex of the participants. The addition of these cardiac cycle timing intervals adds a valuable comparative tool to better understand cardiac physiology in the varsity athletic population. HIGHLIGHTS. Given the lack of data in the literature on athlete's cardiac cycle timing intervals, we provide normative values for healthy, university varsity athletes, including stratification by sex and sport. . Male and female athletes show different cardiac cycle timing intervals, including the systolic and isovolumic relaxation timing intervals. . Differences in cardiac cycle timing intervals are also present when comparing different sports.

Heart rate variability (HRV), systolic blood pressure variability (BPV), and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) are indirect and approximate measures of autonomic regulation of the cardiovascular system. Studies have shown differences in HRV and BRS between males and females; however, no study has observed differences in BPV, HRV, or BRS between male and female athletes. One hundred males (age 21.2 ± 2.1 y; BMI 27.4 ± 4.5 kg/m2) and sixty-five females (age: 19.7 ± 1.6 y; BMI 22.7 ± 2.2 kg/m2) were assessed during the pre-season baseline. We collected resting beat-to-beat blood pressure and R-R intervals using finger photoplethysmography and a 3-lead electrocardiogram, respectively. Participants underwent a controlled slow breathing protocol (six breaths/minute: 5 s inhale, 5 s exhale) for 5 min. Spectral and linear analysis was conducted on blood pressure and ECG data. Regression curves were fitted to the blood pressure and R-R signals, with the slopes providing the BRS parameters. Male athletes had significantly (p < 0.05) lower mean heart rate, RR interval SD2/SD1, HRV % low-frequency, and higher BP high-frequency power during controlled respiration. No differences were found in any BRS parameters. HRV and BPV responses to a slow breathing protocol differed between male and female athletes; however, BRS responses did not.