Field and laboratory studies were conducted in 1987 and 1988 on several Arkansas soils to determine the effects of residual levels of imazaquin on cotton. Imazaquin concentrations ranging from 0.007 to 0.024 μg/g and 0.00 to 0.015 μg/g were found in soil samples taken 12 and 24 months, respectively, following preplant-incorporated applications at rates of 140 g/ha. Cotton yields were reduced from 7 to 42% in 1987 as the soil concentration of imazaquin increased from 0.007 to 0.024 μg/g. Imazaquin persistence was greater in clay soils than loams or sandy loams. Imazaquin was weakly adsorbed to a clay, loam, and sandy loam soil in laboratory studies; the adsorption isotherms did not differ significantly by soil texture. A bioassay utilizing cotton as the indicator species was developed to determine imazaquin concentrations in soils ranging from 0 to 0.06 μg/g. Imazaquin concentrations determined by the bioassay method were found to be 75, 77, and 80% of those determined by chemical extractions for a clay, loam, and sandy loam soil, respectively.
In bioassays, rice (Oryza sativaL.) recovery from metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] injury tended to be slower in flooded rice, but was not significantly different from the recovery rate in a nonflooded rice. In soils treated with 1 ppm (w/w) metolachlor and incubated in constant-temperature chambers, the half-life of metolachlor was shorter at 40 C than at 30 C. The degradation rate of metolachlor was not significantly correlated with declining moisture potentials in the range of −30 to −80 kPa. The CO2evolution from metolachlor-treated soil was negatively correlated with incubation time and positively correlated to declining moisture levels. In a field study, metolachlor, as determined by bioassay, was mobile in a Taloka silt loam soil profile. After being incorporated to 7.5 cm, it became evenly distributed in the top 15 cm of the soil profile within 18 days. Metolachlor adsorption was positively correlated with clay and organic carbon content.
Field studies were conducted in 1987, 1988, and 1989 to evaluate the effects of freshly applied residual levels (simulated residue carryover) of imazaquin and norflurazon on the growth and yield of corn, cotton, grain sorghum, rice, and wheat. Studies ware conducted on five soils, and concentrations of herbicides were determined at crop planting. Crop injury ratings were recorded 4 wk after emergence, and yields were measured at the end of each growing season. In simulated residue carryover studies, corn and grain sorghum injury occurred and yields were reduced when norflurazon concentrations were 450 ng g-1soil or greater. Rice yields were reduced at norflurazon concentrations of 710 ng g-1. Corn, cotton, and wheat heights and yields were reduced when imazaquin concentrations were 13 ng g-1, 13 ng g-1, and 45 ng g-1soil, respectively for crops. Comparisons between simulated carryover and actual carryover were made for corn and cotton grown in imazaquin treated fields as well as for corn grown in a norflurazon treated field.
Field leaching, dissipation, and efficacy of metolachlor (2-chloro-N(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl) -N-(methoxy-1 -methylethyl)acetamide) evaluated for 8 wk when the herbicide was applied by conventional and chemigation methods to a Taloka silt loam soil (coarse-silty, mixed, nonacid, thermic Mollic Albaqualf). Laboratory studies were conducted to evaluate adsorption and mobility of the herbicide in five soil depths ranging from 0 to 38 cm. Metolachlor leaching below 30 cm was not observed in either year, regardless of application method. Dissipation rates of metolachior were not influenced by application method either year. Efficacy of the herbicide was not affected by method of application. Metolachlor sorption was highest in the 0-to 8-cm soil depth of the Taloka silt loam with an organic matter content of 1.1%.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.