Objective The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of extrinsic pigmentation on the dimensional stability, hardness, detail reproduction, and color of a silicone after thermocycling. Materials and Methods Sixty samples of MDX4–4210 silicone (Dow Corning Corporation Medical Products) with intrinsic pink pigment (H-109-P, Factor II) and intrinsic opacifier (TiO) were fabricated. Two groups were created: Group 1—only intrinsic pigmentation (H-109P, Factor II + TiO) (Control); and Group 2—intrinsic (H-109P, Factor II + TiO) and extrinsic (Tan FE - 215, Factor II) pigmentation. The following tests were performed for each group: dimensional stability, Shore A hardness, detail reproduction, and color. Readings for the tests were taken before and after thermocycling (2,000 cycles). For dimensional stability and hardness, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. One-way ANOVA was used for the color test. In case of significant statistical difference, the Tukey test was applied (p <0.05). All samples achieved the same detail reproduction score, therefore, no statistical evaluation was performed. Results For the dimensional stability test, comparing the initial time with the final time, there was a significant contraction in both groups after thermocycling. For the hardness test, comparing the time points, only group 1 showed a significant reduction in hardness after thermocycling. Groups 1 and 2 scored 2 for the detail reproduction test, before and after thermocycling. Comparing group 1 with group 2, there was no significant difference for color change. Conclusion Based on the tests performed, extrinsic pigmentation did not show a negative effect on silicone, and therefore it can be indicated. The results of the dimensional, hardness, detail reproduction and color evaluations of the MDX4–4210 silicone were clinically acceptable in all cases in the groups with and without extrinsic pigmentation.
Background. Occlusal splints can protect teeth during bruxism, preventing tooth wear, as well as during sports activities, shielding them from impacts. Objectives.To verify the influence of thermal cycles and disinfection on the roughness, microhardness and color of polyethylene terephthalate glycol/thermoplastic polyurethane (PETG/TPU) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Materials and methods.Thirty-six PETG/TPU samples and 36 PMMA samples were prepared (ø10 mm × 3 mm). Six groups were created according to the material and the disinfection method used (n = 12 each): PETG/TPU (glister), PETG/TPU (hypochlorite), PETG/TPU (soap), PMMA (glister), PMMA (hypochlorite), and PMMA (soap). Roughness, Knoop microhardness and color evaluations were performed before the experiments (T1), after thermocycling (T2) and after disinfection (T3). Three-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test were used for statistical evaluations.Results. For roughness and color, ANOVA showed statistical significance based on the interaction between thermal cycling, material and disinfectant factors. In terms of Knoop microhardness, ANOVA showed statistical significance based on the interaction between thermal cycling and material factors.Conclusions. Roughness results were clinically acceptable in all groups at all time points, except the PETG/ TPU and PMMA groups disinfected with hypochlorite. Microhardness significantly increased for both materials after thermal cycling, and at all time points, the microhardness of PMMA was significantly higher than that of PETG/TPU. After thermal cycling, the color changes were clinically unacceptable in all groups.
Objectives Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the effect of using two preoperative mouthwashes (0.12% chlorhexidine and 0.2% tea tree oil) on the number of colonies of oral microorganisms. Materials and Methods Forty participants who needed to be rehabilitated with dental implants were included in this study. They were randomly divided into two groups (chlorhexidine group and tea tree group; n = 20, each). For each group, saliva samples were collected at four different times: T0 (initially)—before using the mouthwash, T1—after 1 minute of using the mouthwash, T10—after 10 minutes of using the mouthwash, and T60—after 60 minutes of using the mouthwash. At T0 and T1, saliva samples were collected before implant placement surgery, and at T10 and T60, saliva samples were collected during surgery. In each group, one saliva sample was collected at each evaluated time point for each patient, totaling 4 saliva collections per patient. MSB agar (Mitis-Salivarius-Bacitracin) and BHI agar (Brain Heart Infusion) culture media were used in each group. Microbial colony counts were performed using a magnifying glass and recorded in CFU (colony forming units)/mL. Statistical analyses were performed using the Friedman, Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests (p < 0.05). Results Based on MSB agar culture medium, at T0, the number of Streptococcus mutans colonies in the chlorhexidine group was significantly higher compared with the tea tree group (p <0.05; MSB agar). The chlorhexidine group showed significantly lower CFU/mL values for Streptococcus mutans at T1, T10, and T60 compared with the tea tree group (p <0.05; MSB agar). Based on BHI agar culture medium, at T0, the chlorhexidine group showed a significantly lower value of CFU/mL compared with the tea tree group (p < 0.05; BHI agar). At T1, T10, and T60, the chlorhexidine group showed significantly lower CFU/mL values compared with the tea tree group (p <0.05; BHI agar). Conclusion Chlorhexidine is more indicated as a preoperative mouthwash than tea tree oil, due to its significantly more effective antimicrobial action.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.