Democratic backsliding by incumbents is one of the most prevalent forms of backsliding in recent global trends of democratic erosion. Understanding the attitude of voters toward backsliding incumbents is crucial because popular support is the basis of legitimacy for these incumbents. This article studies voter attitudes in the Philippines, where democracy was subverted by the incumbent president, Rodrigo Duterte, who served from 2016 to 2022. Specifically, we examine the validity of the claim that Filipino voters are acquiring a “taste for illiberal rule” made by some scholars. First, we analyzed the survey data regarding the support for various types of political systems, where part of the data comes from our originally commissioned survey at the Social Weather Stations. Second, we explored Pulse Asia's longitudinal survey data on martial-rule support. Our investigation of these survey data did not find substantive support for the “taste for illiberal rule” proposition. Further, we argue that Filipino voters are contingent supporters of illiberal politics while supporting the procedural principles of democracy at the baseline.
Building quality democracy takes time. It requires a constant review of the performance of institutions that are tasked to deliver in concrete ways the democratic ideal. Improving democratic institutions requires sustained reform efforts. Election administration and election commissions need to be examined against this backdrop of broader democratization issues. Given the importance of election administration in the study of democratic processes, there are very few studies that focus on election administration. By focusing on a specific institution tasked to replicate the ideals of democracy such as the COMELEC, this study offers insights into a deeper understanding of autonomy, bureaucratic integrity and capacity. Though mostly overlooked, election administration plays a vital role in the study of broader democratization questions. Elections promise continuity and stability. But if election administration is done poorly due to the lack of autonomy, integrity, and capacity then it becomes an unsettling and destabilizing exercise.With democratic structures in place for years, the Philippines continues to have problems with the most basic elements of election administration: accuracy in maintaining voter lists, counting votes and adjudicating disputes. The COMELEC oversees election administration, serving as referee and gatekeeper in the Philippines’ electoral arena. The COMELEC is a constitutional commission with ostensible autonomy and power, yet it is also a bureaucracy. The May 2010 election was the first automated election in the Philippines. Widely regarded as a success, there were many issues and incidents that show it was also business as usual for COMELEC. The speed of the canvass count astounded the voting populace, and perhaps operators, but the May 2010 election continues to show embedded problems within the commission that needs to be addressed in order to strengthen the COMELEC as an institution that can provide election administration efficiently and accurately in subsequent elections.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.