This article analysed article 16 of the United Nation convention relating to the status of refugees 1951, which provides free access to courts in the contracting states for all refugees, in relation to victims of sexual violence in refugee camps. However, it was found that with the current state of affairs in the domestic criminal justice system, a victim of crime has no legal standing to have direct access to a court for the enforcement of his or her rights. Instead, the crime is considered as against the state and not against the individual victims, and this has caused severe hardships for victims of sexual violence in refugee camps. Thus, for a victim to benefit maximally and enjoy the requisite free access to court, we argue that victims of sexual violence in a refugee camp should be accorded the locus standi and made a co-party to the prosecution of their perpetrators, as a paradigm shift from the current domestic and international criminal justice system that uses victims as a witness for the state prosecution, so that victims can assert their rights and plead for the required remedy and reparation that will ameliorate their plight. In order to achieve this, the authors are advocating for law reform of both the domestic and international criminal justice system to reflect victims' rights as coprosecutor of their assailant. How to cite: Stevens & Eberechi 'A critical analysis of article 16 of the UN refugee convention in relation to victims of sexual violence in refugee camps in Africa' 2019
This paper addresses a dilemma faced by South African courts relating to the status of assets held in a trust of which one of the parties to a marriage is a trustee. The general rule is that trust property shall not form part of the personal estate of the trustee, except in so far as he or she, as the beneficiary, is entitled to it. This paper illustrates the possible prejudicial effect to vulnerable spouses of strictly applying trust-legal principles when deciding divorce matters. The article submits that courts should objectively assess the facts of the cases before them to determine whether the assets held in a trust would have been part of the trustee’s personal estate had there been no trust created. If the answer is “yes”, then such assets, depending on the marital regime, should be divided between the parties on divorce.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.