No abstract

Purpose This case–control study aimed to assess the influence of BMI and PTS on subsequent ACL injury affecting either ACL graft or the native ACL of the contralateral knee after primary ACL reconstruction. Methods A retrospective case–control study was performed using a cohort of patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between 2010 and 2020 using the same surgical procedure: Hamstring tendon autograft. The study group (group I) included all the patients (n = 94) during this period who sustained a subsequent ACL injury. The control group (group II) consisted of 94 patients randomly selected (matched Group I in terms of sex, age, and ACL graft) who did not sustain any further ACL injury. PTS was measured by two blinded surgeons on lateral knee view radiographs of the operated knee after primary ACL. BMI in kg/m2 was measured during the preoperative anesthesia consultation. Exclusion criteria were: non-true or rotated lateral knee radiographs of the operated knee post-ACLR, associated knee ligament injury requiring surgical management, iterative knee surgeries, open growth plate, and related fracture. Results The mean posterior tibial slope in group I was 7.5° ± 2.9, and 7.2° ± 2.0 in group II. A PTS angle cutoff was set at 10 degrees. The rate of patients showing a PTS ≥ 10° was significantly higher in group I compared to group II (p < 0.01). Patients with PTS ≥ 10° were 5.7 times more likely to sustain a subsequent ACL injury, (OR: 5.7 95% CI[1.858–17.486]). The Average BMI in group I was 24.5 ± 3.7 kg.m−2 compared to group II which was 23.3 ± 3.0 kg.m−2. There were no significant differences in any of the four BMI categories between both groups (p value 0.289). A series of BMI cut-offs were also analyzed at 23 to30 kg/m2, and there was no significant difference between both groups. Conclusions A posterior tibial slope equal to or above 10 degrees measured on lateral knee radiographs was associated with 5.7 times higher risk of ACL graft rupture or contralateral native ACL injury; however, BMI was not.

No abstract

PurposeThe aim was to assess the consequences of quadriceps tendon (QT) harvest on knee extensor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) compared to hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Secondary objectives were to evaluate flexor strength recovery and search for correlation between strength status and functional outcome. Methods This a retrospective cohort of 44 patients who underwent ACL-R using either QT (25) or HT (19). Median age was 31.1 years. We assessed thigh muscle strength thanks to concentric iso kinetic evaluation (peak torque) at 60°.s −1 , 180°.s −1 , 240°.s −1 and eccentric at 30°.s −1 , 7 months on average after surgery. Muscle strength values were compared to the uninjured leg in order to calculate a percentage of deficit as well as unilateral hamstring/quadriceps (H/Q) ratios. KOOS score was obtained at a mean follow-up of 18 months. Results Extensor strength deficit (concentric 60°.s −1 ) was one average 33.1% in the QT group and 28.2% in the HT group (p = 0.42). Difference of flexor strength deficit (concentric 60°.s −1 ) was close to be significant with 5% and 12% of deficit in the QT and HT group, respectively (p = 0.1), and statistically significant for high angular velocity (14% versus 3% at 240°. s −1 , p = 0.04). H/Q ratios were comparable in both groups ranging from 0.62 to 0.78. Quadriceps muscle strength deficit was negatively correlated with the KOOS score (Pearson coefficient = −0.4; p = 0. 005). Conclusion QT autograft harvest does not yield significant quadriceps muscle weakness after ACL-R, which appear to be a pejorative factor for functional outcome. Level of evidence IV, Retrospective study.