International audienceThe mapping of ecosystem service supply has become quite common in ecosystem service assessment practice for terrestrial ecosystems, but land cover remains the most common indicator for ecosystems ability to deliver ecosystem services. For marine ecosystems, practice is even less advanced, with a clear deficit in spatially-explicit assessments of ecosystem service supply. This ``situation, which generates considerable uncertainty in the assessment of ecosystems' ability to support current and future human well-being, contrasts with increasing understanding of the role of terrestrial and marine biodiversity for ecosystem functioning and thereby for ecosystem services. This paper provides a synthesis of available approaches, models and tools, and data sources, that are able to better link ecosystem service mapping to current understanding of the role of ecosystem service providing organisms and land/seascape structure in ecosystem functioning. Based on a review of literature, models and associated geo-referenced metrics are classified according to the way in which land or marine use, ecological processes and especially biodiversity effects are represented. We distinguish five types of models: proxy-based, phenomenological, niche-based, trait-based and full-process. Examples from each model type are presented and data requirements considered. Our synthesis demonstrates that the current understanding of the role of biota in ecosystem services can effectively be incorporated into mapping approaches and opens avenues for further model development using hybrid approaches tailored to available resources. We end by discussing ways to resolve sources of uncertainty associated with model representation of biotic processes and with data availability. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
International audienceIn landscape ecology, the importance of map extent and resolution on the value of landscape indices is widely discussed, but the information content of the map, mostly derived from remote sensing images, is not. In this study, we sought (1) to understand the influence of changes in maps' spatial and spectral resolution of agricultural landscape elements, taking hedgerow networks as a case study, and (2) to explore how predictions of species distribution might be affected by maps' resolutions, taking two carabid species as a case study. To do so, we compared maps from different remote sensors, derived two landscape characterization variables from the maps related to patterns known to drive ecological processes, and analyzed their predictive power on biological data distribution to assess the information content of these maps. The results show that (1) the use of several methods, including landscape metrics, was useful to assess map validity; (2) the spatial resolution of satellite images is not the only important factor; changes in spectral resolution significantly alter maps; (3) the relevant definition of "hedgerow" to construct functional maps is species and process specific; thus the different maps are not either good or bad, but rather provide complementary information; (4) the more a species responds to network structure and over small areas, the less the different maps can be substitutable one to another
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.