Cholinergic dysfunction has been associated with cognitive abnormalities in a variety of neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases. Here we tested how information processing is regulated by cholinergic tone in genetically modified mice targeting the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT), a protein required for acetylcholine release. We measured long-term potentiation of Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapses in vivo and assessed information processing by using a mouse touchscreen version of paired associates learning task (PAL). Acquisition of information in the mouse PAL task correlated to levels of hippocampal VAChT, suggesting a critical role for cholinergic tone. Accordingly, synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus in vivo was disturbed, but not completely abolished, by decreased hippocampal cholinergic signaling. Disrupted forebrain cholinergic signaling also affected working memory, a result reproduced by selectively decreasing VAChT in the hippocampus. In contrast, spatial memory was relatively preserved, whereas reversal spatial memory was sensitive to decreased hippocampal cholinergic signaling. This work provides a refined roadmap of how synaptically secreted acetylcholine influences distinct behaviors and suggests that distinct forms of cognitive processing may be regulated in different ways by cholinergic activity.

Visual Abstract

Spike timing-dependent plasticity in the hippocampus has rarely been studied in vivo. Using extracellular potential and current source density analysis in urethane-anesthetized adult rats, we studied synaptic plasticity at the basal dendritic excitatory synapse in CA1 after excitation-spike (ES) pairing; E was a weak basal dendritic excitation evoked by stratum oriens stimulation, and S was a population spike evoked by stratum radiatum apical dendritic excitation. We hypothesize that positive ES pairing-generating synaptic excitation before a spike-results in long-term potentiation (LTP) while negative ES pairing results in long-term depression (LTD). Pairing (50 pairs at 5 Hz) at ES intervals of -10 to 0 ms resulted in significant input-specific LTP of the basal dendritic excitatory sink, lasting 60-120 min. Pairing at +10- to +20-ms ES intervals, or unpaired 5-Hz stimulation, did not induce significant basal dendritic or apical dendritic LTP or LTD. No basal dendritic LTD was found after stimulation of stratum oriens with 200 pairs of high-intensity pulses at 25-ms interval. Pairing-induced LTP was abolished by pretreatment with an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, 3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP), which also reduced spike bursting during 5-Hz pairing. Pairing at 0.5 Hz did not induce spike bursts or basal dendritic LTP. In conclusion, ES pairing at 5 Hz resulted in input-specific basal dendritic LTP at ES intervals of -10 ms to 0 ms but no LTD at ES intervals of -20 to +20 ms. Associative LTP likely occurred because of theta-rhythmic coincidence of subthreshold excitation with a backpropagated spike burst, which are conditions that can occur naturally in the hippocampus.

Theta rhythm and long-term potentiation (LTP) are 2 remarkable discoveries. The theta rhythm is an oscillatory neural activity of 3–10 Hz in the hippocampus. LTP is implicated as a cellular basis of memory, but the function of theta oscillation in memory is not clear. This review suggests that theta rhythm bestows optimal conditions for hippocampal LTP and memory encoding. Theta rhythm in hippocampal CA1 is generated mainly by 2 oscillating dipoles—somatic-inhibition and phase-shifted, distal dendritic excitation, with a smaller contribution by rhythmic proximal (CA3) excitation and distal inhibition. Our recent study showed that LTP of the excitatory synapses on the basal or apical dendrites of CA1 pyramidal cells peaked twice in a theta cycle, at the rising (R) and the midcycle (M) phase of the theta rhythm recorded at the distal apical dendrites. In contrast, evoked population spike excitability peaked at a single phase near the midcycle. We infer that R and M peaks of LTP correspond to maximal dendritic depolarization and maximal somatic depolarization of CA1 pyramidal cells, respectively. A ∼50° phase shift between LTP-versus-theta-phase functions suggests independent LTP at the basal and apical dendrites. It is argued that theta phase–dependent LTP occurs under physiological conditions, by pairing presynaptic activity with oscillating postsynaptic depolarization. Place cells, showing intrinsic membrane potential oscillations, are ideal LTP participants. It is suggested that theta phase–dependent LTP contributes to memory encoding, and disruption of either theta oscillation or LTP may disrupt memory in various neurological disorders, including epilepsy and Alzheimer’s disease.