Implantation of an anterior chamber multifocal phakic IOL to correct presbyopia was effective and gave good predictability. The procedure is reversible in cases of patient intolerance to the IOL, unwanted optical phenomena, or complications. Strict inclusion criteria should be used for patient selection.

Purpose: To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes with ocriplasmin in patients with vitreomacular traction (VMT) with or without macular hole (MH). Methods: In a Phase 4, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study, eligible patients (VMT with focal adhesion, without epiretinal membrane, and with MH ≤400 µm [if present]) received a single intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin. Nonsurgical resolution of VMT (Day 28 [primary endpoint]), best-corrected visual acuity, MH closure, vitrectomy rate, and safety were assessed through Day 180. Results: Overall, 466 patients were included in the full analysis set, of whom 47.4% had VMT resolution by Day 28; resolution rates in patients with VMT without MH, VMT with MH ≤250 µm, and VMT with MH >250 to ≤400 µm were 43.4%, 68.6%, and 62.7%, respectively. Macular hole closure was higher in eyes with VMT and MH ≤250 µm (57.1%) than in eyes with VMT and MH >250 to ≤400 µm (27.5%) at Day 28. Overall, 30.8% of patients with VMT resolution gained ≥10 letters in best-corrected visual acuity at Day 180. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of ocriplasmin. Conclusion: Ocriplasmin is effective for resolution of VMT without or with MH (≤400 μm); treatment outcomes can be optimized with patient selection.

In an everyday surgical practice, none of the studied bilateral ReSTOR cataract patients without astigmatism required spectacles when followed up 6 months or later. Intermediate VA was compatible with reading and led to high patient satisfaction.

The recent approval of voretigene neparvovec (Luxturna®) for patients with biallelic RPE65 mutation-associated inherited retinal dystrophy with viable retinal cells represents an important step in the development of ocular gene therapies. Herein, we review studies investigating the episomal persistence of different recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vector genomes and the pre-clinical and clinical evidence of long-term effects of different RPE65 gene replacement therapies. A targeted review of articles published between 1974 and January 2021 in Medline®, Embase®, and other databases, was conducted, followed by a descriptive longitudinal analysis of the clinical trial outcomes of voretigene neparvovec. Following an initial screening, 14 publications examining the episomal persistence of different rAAV genomes and 71 publications evaluating gene therapies in animal models were included. Viral genomes were found to persist for at least 22 months (longest study follow-up) as transcriptionally active episomes. Treatment effects lasting almost a decade were reported in canine disease models, with more pronounced effects the earlier the intervention. The clinical trial outcomes of voretigene neparvovec are consistent with pre-clinical findings and reveal sustained results for up to 7.5 years for the full-field light sensitivity threshold test and 5 years for the multi-luminance mobility test in the Phase I and Phase III trials, respectively. In conclusion, the therapeutic effect of voretigene neparvovec lasts for at least a decade in animal models and 7.5 years in human subjects. Since retinal cells can retain functionality over their lifetime after transduction, these effects may be expected to last even longer in patients with a sufficient number of outer retinal cells at the time of intervention.