Background Cisplatin has been largely used in the treatment of advanced, unresectable gastric cancer, mainly in combinations with fluoropyrimidines and anthracyclines. Oxaliplatin has been shown to be at least as effective as cisplatin for this disease, but with less toxicity and a better tolerability profile, especially for older patients. We performed a systematic review of the literature to address and quantify differences in the efficacy and the safety between oxaliplatin and cisplatin for the treatment of this disease. Methods The literature was searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oxaliplatin to cisplatin. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to analyze dichotomous variables. Hazard ratios (HRs) for progression and death were combined with an inverse variance method based on logarithmic conversion. A fixed effect model and Mantel-Haenszel's (M-H) method were used. Heterogeneity was tested with the Q test and the I 2 value. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results Three RCTs were identified, involving a total of 1294 patients. Oxaliplatin significantly improved progression-free survival (HR = 0.88, p = 0.02) and overall survival (HR = 0.88, p = 0.04). Moreover, it was associated with less neutropenia (OR = 0.53, p \ 0.01) and fewer thromboembolic events (OR = 0.42, p \ 0.01), but it was also associated with increased neurotoxicity (OR = 6.91, p \ 0.01). Conclusions Our results support the existence of a small but significant survival benefit of oxaliplatin over cisplatin. Oxaliplatin is associated with less toxicity and better tolerability, especially in older patients and when used in twodrug, bi-weekly regimens.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy and cause of death from cancer among adults worldwide. In recent years, the use of 5-fluorouracil-based regimens in combination with molecularly targeted agents has greatly expanded treatment options for patients with metastatic disease. With a more capillary use of this new class of agents comes the recognition of diverse adverse events related to disturbance of critical biological pathways involved in physiological functions. Proactive management and prevention of adverse events, with a focus on the necessary compromise between adverse events and tumor control, are often effective and allows for uninterrupted, full-dose therapy with targeted agents. Quality of life does not appear deteriorated, rather improved due to efficacy in prolonging wellness.
Haematological toxicity characterized by delayed and reversible neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia is an adverse effect observed in 40% of patients receiving fotemustine. We report the case of a 66-year-old man with metastatic malignant melanoma treated with fotemustine as monotherapy. A severe persistent and prolonged thrombocytopenia occurred, so that chemotherapy was discontinued. Bone marrow involvement was excluded. The physician should be aware of this prolonged thrombocytopenia secondary to fotemustine, so that it may be recognized early and not attributed erroneously to tumour evolution. This observation could be substantial for the design of combination regimens with fotemustine and other myelotoxic drugs in pretreated melanoma patients.
The "Misura" project is a retrospective survey, with the aim to evaluate how 5FU is used in the treatment of colorectal cancer in clinical practice in Italian oncology departments. Twenty-four centers participated. Patients seen in the second half of 1998 with colorectal cancer and treated with 5FU were analyzed. Observed patients were 664, 45.9% of patients presented metastatic disease. Biochemical modulation with folinic acid and bolus 5FU was the most used schedule (59%). The De Gramont (LV 5FU2) regimen, alone or with other cytotoxic drugs, was the second most chosen schedule (14%). The most frequent side effect observed was gastrointestinal toxicity. No hematological toxicity was demonstrated in 68.8% of patients. Cutaneous toxicity occurred in 21.1% of patients. 5FU is widely used independently by the stage of disease. In palliative treatment a variety of schedules were administered by the Italian centers, lacking a standard therapy. There are very few surveys investigating oncology clinical practice. A larger survey on this issue is auspicable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.