Objective:This study compared beliefs about the causes, treatments, and psychosocial consequences of schizophrenia in a sample of 714 lay respondents, 465 mental health professionals, and 709 key relatives of patients with this disorder. Method:We conducted the survey in 30 Italian geographic areas that we randomly selected after considering location and population density. We used the Questionnaire About Opinions on Mental Illness (QO) to collect data. Results:Of those surveyed, 34% of the lay respondents, 20% of the professionals, and 68% of the relatives stated that schizophrenia is exclusively caused by psychosocial factors. Lay respondents' opinions on patients' civil rights and social competence tended to be more similar to those expressed by professionals then to those reported by relatives. Lay respondents differed from the other 2 groups in their beliefs regarding the effectiveness of psychological treatments, patients' unpredictability, and whether patients should be admitted to asylums. Conclusions:These results suggest that the general public needs to be better informed about schizophrenia's main characteristics, available treatments, and risk for dangerous behaviours. The existing gap among the study's target populations could be reduced through campaigns aimed at increasing public awareness of the affective and civil rights of patients. (Can J Psychiatry 2004;49:323-331)

The results suggest that a psychoeducational family intervention may have a significant impact on functional outcomes of schizophrenia when provided to patients and caregivers in real-world settings.

Subjective and objective burden, psychiatric symptoms and coping strategies in a sample of 90 key relatives and other relatives of patients with schizophrenia, living in two European countries, were explored by means of well-validated questionnaires. The levels of burden on key relatives did not differ significantly from those on other relatives. Moreover, the risk of developing psychiatric symptoms was similar in the two subject groups at both centres. Significant correlations were found between key relatives and other relatives concerning the adoption of emotion-focused coping strategies. These data contrast with the current belief that family burden in schizophrenia is mainly a burden of key relatives, and they emphasize the need to provide supportive interventions for as many relatives as possible.

The authors explored the social network of caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in relation to relatives' sociodemographic characteristics, patients' clinical variables, family burden, and pessimism about the consequences of the disease. They evaluated 709 key relatives of patients with schizophrenia concerning the above-mentioned variables by means of well-validated questionnaires. A more supportive social network was found in relatives who reported lower levels of burden and pessimism about schizophrenia. The effect of social network on relatives' burden and opinions about schizophrenia was significantly different in relation to relatives' gender. Strengthening the relatives' social network may represent a useful strategy to alleviate their burden and pessimism about schizophrenia.

Participatory studies may provide ideas for a more constructive interaction between patients and professionals.