Studies have shown that the pandemic has led to an increase in sick leave periods among healthcare workers (HCWs); however, this might have changed over time considering increase in vaccination coverage and change in COVID-19 variant predominance. Therefore, we conducted an observational study to evaluate whether the type of symptoms and the duration of sick leave period for healthcare workers working in a large university hospital in the South of Italy changed between January 2021 and January 2022; 398 cases of COVID-19 were identified for a total of 382 subjects involved. A total of 191 subjects answered the questionnaire about symptoms; of these, 79 had COVID-19 during the period from March 2020 until February 2022. The results showed a decrease of about 1.2 days in sick leave period for each quarter without finding significant differences in the perception of symptoms. It is possible to hypothesize a contribution from the Omicron variant to the decrease in sick leave period in the last quarter, from vaccination coverage, from optimization of COVID-19 management, and from change in the regulations for the assessment of positivity.

No abstract

IntroductionIn Europe, there is still suboptimal tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) booster coverage. This study aimed to assess coverage status, knowledge, and attitude on Tdap vaccination in healthcare workers (HcWs) of the University Hospital “Federico II” in Naples, Southern Italy, in 2022, to improve current vaccination strategies.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using a validated anonymous questionnaire. Knowledge and attitude were measured as scores. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were employed to identify correlates of Tdap booster and knowledge and attitude toward the vaccination, as appropriate. Models were controlled for age, sex, profession, department, and job seniority.ResultsA total of 206 questionnaires were administered among HcWs, and 143 (69.4%) were medical doctors. In total, 71 (34.47%) HcWs received the Tdap booster. Those who have worked 5–9 years at the hospital had a 78% lower likelihood of being vaccinated with the Tdap booster (5–9 years—OR: 0.22, CI: 0.06 | 0.85) as compared with newly hired HcWs. No differences in the average knowledge score were found. Other healthcare workers had a lower attitude as compared to medical doctors (Other—Coef. −2.15; CI: −4.14 | −0.15) and, as compared with those who worked in a clinical department, those who worked in a diagnostic–therapeutic department or medical management had 3.1 and 2.0 lower attitude scores, on average, respectively (diagnostic–therapeutic—Coef. −3.12, CI: −5.13 | −1.12; public health—Coef. −1.98, CI: −3.41 | −0.56).DiscussionThe study findings support the necessity to implement public health strategies and improve knowledge and attitude toward vaccinations and specifically highlight the importance of Tdap booster every 10 years as a prevention tool to protect high-risk populations.

Hearing health prevention has emerged as a significant public health concern worldwide. With nearly two and a half billion people experiencing some degree of hearing loss, and around seven hundred million requiring medical intervention, the impact on global health is substantial. The economic burden is equally substantial, with estimated health costs reaching 980 billion dollars in the United States alone. To shed light on this issue, we conducted a survey-based cross-sectional study involving 1150 individuals. Utilizing multiple linear regression across three models, we aimed to explore the association between demographic variables and knowledge, attitude, and behaviors related to hearing health. In Model I, we observed a correlation between knowledge and several factors, including age, smoking habits, marital status, and education. In Model II, attitudes were found to associate with non-smoking habits, education, and knowledge. Model III revealed a statistically significant correlation between behaviors and age, gender, parenthood, knowledge, and attitudes. These findings emphasize the importance of targeted public health programs aimed at improving behaviors among the general population. Such interventions can be both effective and relatively inexpensive. By addressing these determinants, we can enhance overall hearing health in the community. Our study contributes valuable information about the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to hearing health in the general population. Understanding these factors is crucial in developing evidence-based strategies to promote hearing health and prevent hearing loss effectively. As we continue to work towards better hearing health, the findings from this study can serve as a cornerstone for informed decision-making and successful intervention implementation.