No abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) maps of the hydropathic environments of protein amino acid residues are information-rich descriptors of preferred conformations, interaction types and energetics, and solvent accessibility. The interactions made by each residue are the primary factor for rotamer selection and the secondary, tertiary, and even quaternary protein structure. Our evolving basis set of environmental data for each residue type can be used to understand the protein structure. This work focuses on the aromatic residues phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan and their structural roles. We calculated and analyzed side chain-to-environment 3D maps for over 70,000 residues of these three types that reveal, with respect to hydrophobic and polar interactions, the environment around each. After binning with backbone ϕ/ψ and side chain χ1, we clustered each bin by 3D similarities between map–map pairs. For each of the three residue types, four bins were examined in detail: one in the β-pleat, two in the right-hand α-helix, and one in the left-hand α-helix regions of the Ramachandran plot. For high degrees of side chain burial, encapsulation of the side chain by hydrophobic interactions is ubiquitous. The more solvent-exposed side chains are more likely to be involved in polar interactions with their environments. Evidence for π–π interactions was observed in about half of the residues surveyed [phenylalanine (PHE): 53.3%, tyrosine (TYR): 34.1%, and tryptophan (TRP): 55.7%], but on an energy basis, this contributed to only ∼4% of the total. Evidence for π–cation interactions was observed in 14.1% of PHE, 8.3% of TYR, and 26.8% of TRP residues, but on an energy basis, this contributed to only ∼1%. This recognition of even these subtle interactions in the 3D hydropathic environment maps is key support for our interaction homology paradigm of protein structure elucidation and possibly prediction.

Mechanosensitive channels respond to mechanical forces exerted on the cell membrane and play vital roles in regulating the chemical equilibrium within cells and their environment. High-resolution structural information is required to understand the gating mechanisms of mechanosensitive channels. Protein-lipid interactions are essential for the structural and functional integrity of mechanosensitive channels, but detergents cannot maintain the crucial native lipid environment for purified mechanosensitive channels. Recently, detergent-free systems have emerged as alternatives for membrane protein structural biology. This report shows that while membrane-active polymer, SMA2000, could retain some native cell membrane lipids on the transmembrane domain of the mechanosensitive-like YnaI channel, the complete structure of the transmembrane domain of YnaI was not resolved. This reveals a significant limitation of SMA2000 or similar membrane-active copolymers. This limitation may come from the heterogeneity of the polymers and nonspecific interactions between the polymers and the relatively large hydrophobic pockets within the transmembrane domain of YnaI. However, this limitation offers development opportunities for detergent-free technology for challenging membrane proteins.

Atomic-resolution protein structural models are prerequisites for many downstream activities like structure-function studies or structure-based drug discovery. Unfortunately, this data is often unavailable for some of the most interesting and therapeutically important proteins. Thus, computational tools for building native-like structural models from less-than-ideal experimental data are needed. To this end, interaction homology exploits the character, strength and loci of the sets of interactions that define a structure. Each residue type has its own limited set of backbone angle-dependent interaction motifs, as defined by their environments. In this work, we characterize the interactions of serine, cysteine and S-bridged cysteine in terms of 3D hydropathic environment maps. As a result, we explore several intriguing questions. Are the environments different between the isosteric serine and cysteine residues? Do some environments promote the formation of cystine S–S bonds? With the increasing availability of structural data for water-insoluble membrane proteins, are there environmental differences for these residues between soluble and membrane proteins? The environments surrounding serine and cysteine residues are dramatically different: serine residues are about 50% solvent exposed, while cysteines are only 10% exposed; the latter are more involved in hydrophobic interactions although there are backbone angle-dependent differences. Our analysis suggests that one driving force for –S–S– bond formation is a rather substantial increase in burial and hydrophobic interactions in cystines. Serine and cysteine become less and more, respectively, solvent-exposed in membrane proteins. 3D hydropathic environment maps are an evolving structure analysis tool showing promise as elements in a new protein structure prediction paradigm.

Graphical abstract