To better understand the pharmacokinetics and potential advantages of a levothyroxine oral solution vs. tablets and soft gel capsules.4 randomized, 2-treatment, single-dose (600 mcg levothyroxine), 2-way crossover bioequivalence studies in 84 healthy subjects were analyzed. Samples were collected before dosing and until 48-72 h post-dose to calculate noncompartmental baseline-adjusted pharmacokinetic parameters: maximum concentration, time to maximum concentration, and area-under-the-concentration-time-curve from 0 to 48 h and from 0 to 2 h.Mean pharmacokinetic parameters (±standard deviation) for tablets, capsules and solution, respectively, were: area-under-the-concentration-time-curve from 0 to 2 h (ng*h/mL)=68.4±32.8, 64.4±24.4, 99.1±22.7; area-under-the-concentration-time-curve from 0 to 48 h (ng*h/mL)=1 632±424, 1 752±445, 1 862±439; maximum concentration (ng/mL)=67.6±20.9, 68.0±15.9, 71.4±16.0; time of maximum concentration (hours)=2.25±0.99, 2.38±1.58, 1.96±1.07. Overall rate and extent of exposure were not statistically different between formulations, but a faster onset of absorption for the solution was suggested (greater area-under-the-concentration-time-curve from 0 to 2 h and faster time to maximum concentration by an average of 30 min).Levothyroxine rate and extent of exposure are similar between tested formulations. The solution appears however to reach systemic circulation quicker as dissolution is not needed before absorption starts. The solution's greater early exposure and a faster time to maximal concentration of around 30 min may be of benefit to minimize drug-food interactions and deserves further investigations.

This trial suggested that a 7-day course of treatment with a ketoprofen patch is useful in benign ankle sprain, without revealing unexpected adverse events.

-Purpose:Clinical studies have suggested that proton pump inhibitors may decrease levothyroxine absorption and an in vitro study suggested that the effect of pH on dissolution may differ with formulation. To determine the impact of formulation on the pharmacokinetics of levothyroxine in altered gastric pH conditions, this study compared the pharmacokinetics of levothyroxine capsules and tablets, two formulations deemed bioequivalent in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions, when taken with or without esomeprazole. Methods: Two clinical studies were conducted in healthy volunteers given single dose levothyroxine (600 g) with a 45-day washout period. In Study 1 (parallel-design/two-way crossover), 16 subjects received either levothyroxine capsules or tablets, each group with or without prior administration of intravenous esomeprazole (maximum dose of 80 mg). In Study 2 (two-way crossover), 16 subjects received both capsules or tablets after intravenous esomeprazole. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and up to 24 hours post-dose. Baselineadjusted pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated: C max (maximal concentration), T max (time to C max ), AUC 0-t (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to the last detectable concentration), AUC 0-6 and AUC 0-12 (areas under the curve from 0 to 6 and 12 hours, respectively). Analyses of variance were conducted to compare lntransformed C max and AUC. Non-parametric T max analyses were done. Results: In Study 1, esomeprazole caused a greater decrease in overall levothyroxine exposure of tablets vs. capsules (13% vs 6% for C max , 18% vs. 14% for AUC 0-6 , 17% vs. 5% for AUC 0-12 and 10% vs. 8% for AUC 0-t ). In Study 2 esomeprazole administration resulted in a 16% smaller levothyroxine exposure with tablets vs. capsules. No statistically significant differences in T max were found. Conclusions: Although both formulations are considered "bioequivalent" in healthy volunteers, they may not necessarily be bioequivalent in patients with impaired gastric pH conditions. Levothyroxine capsules may therefore be more appropriate for patients with decreased gastric acidity.

The two formulations tested were similarly effective in increasing DHA and EPA concentrations in plasma and lysed whole blood, and showed comparable bioavailability for both active components.

The levothyroxine soft capsule formulated with the stricter new potency guideline set forward by the Food and Drug Administration met equivalence criteria in terms of rate and extent of exposure under fasting conditions to the reference tablet formulation. Clinical doses of the capsule formulation can be given using any combination of the commercialized strengths.

A new formulation of levothyroxine sodium has been developed in the form of an oral solution contained in unit-dose ampules. A study has been conducted to compare the bioavailability of levothyroxine sodium oral solution and levothyroxine sodium soft capsule in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. The rate and extent of absorption of the new levothyroxine solution were also evaluated when administered on dilution in water or directly into the mouth without water. In each period, according to the randomization scheme, subjects were administered single oral doses of either test, as 4 × 150-μg unit-dose ampules, with or without water, or reference, as 4 × 150-μg capsules in a crossover design. Thirty-six subjects were randomized and dosed in this study; of these, 31 completed all study periods. When comparing the solution with the capsule (both products administered with water), the 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of log-transformed values of AUC and C were within 90.00% and 111.11%, respectively, for baseline-corrected levothyroxine. Moreover, the administration of levothyroxine oral solution without water did not affect the rate and extent of its absorption. In conclusion, levothyroxine oral solution unit-dose ampules were bioequivalent to the levothyroxine capsule when administered with or without water. All formulations were well tolerated, with no major side effects.

Levothyroxine soft capsules meet BE criteria in terms of systemic exposure when compared to a European reference tablet under fasting conditions in healthy volunteers.

In healthy subjects, the 75 mg soft-gel capsules were not inferior to the oral solution in terms of serum TXB2 inhibition, indicating that the novel formulation could be an effective alternative in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.