Objective To examine risk of malignancy and death in patients with kidney transplant who receive the immunosuppressive drug sirolimus.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.Data sources Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to March 2013.Eligibility Randomized controlled trials comparing immunosuppressive regimens with and without sirolimus in recipients of kidney or combined pancreatic and renal transplant for which the author was willing to provide individual patient level data. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full text reports of potentially eligible trials to identify studies for inclusion. All eligible trials reported data on malignancy or survival. Results The search yielded 2365 unique citations. Patient level data were available from 5876 patients from 21 randomized trials. Sirolimus was associated with a 40% reduction in the risk of malignancy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.93) and a 56% reduction in the risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (0.44, 0.30 to 0.63) compared with controls. The most pronounced effect was seen in patients who converted to sirolimus from an established immunosuppressive regimen, resulting in a reduction in risk of malignancy (0.34, 0.28 to 0.41), non-melanoma skin cancer (0.32, 0.24 to 0.42), and other cancers (0.52, 0.38 to 0.69). Sirolimus was associated with an increased risk of death (1.43, 1.21 to 1.71) compared with controls.Conclusions Sirolimus was associated with a reduction in the risk of malignancy and non-melanoma skin cancer in transplant recipients. The benefit was most pronounced in patients who converted from an established immunosuppressive regimen to sirolimus. Given the risk of mortality, however, the use of this drug does not seem warranted for most patients with kidney transplant. Further research is needed to determine if different populations, such as those at high risk of cancer, might benefit from sirolimus.

No abstract

It is unclear if there is an association between the duration of delayed graft function (DGF) and kidney transplant (KT) outcomes. This study investigated the impact of prolonged DGF on patient and graft survivals, and renal function one year after KT. This single center retrospective analysis included all deceased donor KT performed between Jan/1998 and Dec/2008 (n = 1412). Patients were grouped in quartiles according to duration of DGF (1–5, 6–10, 11–15, and >15 days, designated as prolonged DGF). The overall incidence of DGF was 54.2%. Prolonged DGF was associated with retransplantation (OR 2.110, CI95% 1.064–4.184,p = 0.033) and more than 3 HLA mismatches (OR 1.819, CI95% 1.117–2.962,p = 0.016). The incidence of acute rejection was higher in patients with DGF compared with those without DGF (36.2% vs. 12.2%, p<0.001). Compared to patients without DGF, DGF(1–5), DGF(6–10), and DGF(11–15), patients with prolonged DGF showed inferior one year patient survival (95.2% vs. 95.4% vs. 95.5% vs. 93.4% vs. 88.86%, p = 0.003), graft survival (91% vs. 91.4% vs. 92% vs. 88.7% vs. 70.5%, p<0.001), death-censored graft survival (95.7% vs. 95.4% vs. 96.4% vs. 94% vs. 79.3%, p<0.001), and creatinine clearance (58.0±24.6 vs. 55.8±22.2 vs. 53.8±24.1 vs. 53.0±27.2 vs. 36.8±27.0 mL/min, p<0.001), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that prolonged DGF was an independent risk factor for graft loss (OR 3.876, CI95% 2.270–6.618, p<0.001), death censored graft loss (OR 4.103, CI95% 2.055–8.193, p<0.001), and death (OR 3.065, CI95% 1.536–6.117, p = 0.001). Prolonged DGF, determined by retransplantation and higher HLA mismatches, was associated with inferior renal function, and patient and graft survivals at one year.

Planned conversion from tacrolimus to sirolimus was evaluated in de novo kidney transplant recipients. In this multicenter, randomized, open-label study, 297 patients were initially treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate sodium and prednisone. Of the 283 patients reaching 3 months, 97 were converted to sirolimus (SRL), 107 were maintained on tacrolimus (TAC) and 79 were patients receiving TAC without criteria to undergo intervention at month 3 (TACex). The primary objective was to show superior estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the SRL group at month 24. Of the 258 patients who completed 24 months, 91 (94%) were in the SRL group, 101 (94%) in the TAC group and 66 (84%) in the TACex group. In the intention-to-treat population there were no differences in eGFR (66.2 AE 25.3 vs. 70.7 AE 25.1, p ¼ 0.817) or in the severity of chronic sclerosing lesions scores in 24-month protocol biopsies. Higher mean urinary protein-tocreatinine ratio (0.36 AE 0.69 vs. 0.15 AE 0.53, p ¼ 0.03) and higher incidence of treated acute rejection between months 3-24 (13.4% vs. 4.7%, p ¼ 0.047) were observed in SRL compared to TAC group. In this population planned conversion from TAC to SRL 3 months after kidney transplantation was not associated with improved renal function at 24 months.

Dyslipidemia is frequent at 1 year after transplantation. The lack of agreement among changes observed in lipid fractions and ratios suggests that more studies are necessary to guide therapy besides targeting LDL-C concentrations as recommended by current guidelines.

Individual adjustment of the initial TAC dose according to the CYP3A5 haplotypes comprising the CYP3A5*3, *6 and *7 defective alleles might prove beneficial to Brazilian renal transplant recipients and should be further investigated in prospective trials.

In patients receiving TAC, MMF produced similar efficacy but superior safety profile compared with SRL.

Tacrolimus (TAC) is considered a critical dose drug. The purpose of our study was to investigate circadian and time-dependent changes in TAC pharmacokinetics over the first year after kidney transplantation. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were performed in 26 recipients of first living donor kidney transplants at day 7 after morning (a.m.) and evening (p.m.) doses of TAC. Additional serial PK studies were carried out in nine patients at month 6 (M6) and month 12 (M12). Blood samples were collected before 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h after TAC administration. Demographics, TAC and adjunctive immunosuppressive doses, hematology, and biochemistry were recorded in each PK study. Mean age was 37 years, body mass index 23 kg/m(2), 58% males, and 85% Caucasian. Higher AUC (231.4 vs. 220 ng.h/mL, P = 0.06) and C(max) (34.1 +/- 12.6 vs. 24.4 +/- 9.8 ng/mL, P < 0.001), and lower T(max) (1.6 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.7 +/- 2.0 h, P = 0.05) values were observed comparing a.m. and p.m. administrations. Comparing D7, M6 and M12, there was a significant increase in dose-normalized AUC (31.4 +/- 22.2 vs. 50.1 +/- 33 vs. 39.2 +/- 24.4 ng.h/mL/mg, P = 0.005), C(max) (4.4 +/- 2.4 vs. 7.8 +/- 3.5 vs. 6.0 +/- 3.3 ng/mL/mg, P < 0.001) and T(max) (1.6 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.8 h, P = 0.006), respectively. Over the first year the intraindividual variability of dose-normalized AUC, C(max) and C(0) were 82%, 72%, and 90%, respectively. No significant changes were observed comparing inter-individual variability of dose-normalized AUC (21%, 24%, 33%), C(max) (46%, 45%, 55%), C(0) (49%, 83%, 81%) at D7, M6 and M12, respectively. We observed a good correlation between a.m. and p.m. TAC AUC (r(2) = 0.90) and C(0) (r(2) = 0.88). Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics display circadian variation suggesting a slower and delayed absorption phase at nighttime. Tacrolimus also showed time-dependent PK changes, suggesting an improvement in absorption during the first 6 months. Despite circadian variation we observed good correlations between a.m. and p.m. TAC AUC (r(2) = 0.90) and C(0) (r(2) = 0.88) and between C(0) and total daily TAC exposure (a.m. + p.m. AUC) suggesting that trough-guided therapeutic monitoring is still a reliable and simple strategy to optimize the clinical use of TAC.