Suspicion of an SC should lead to performance of a magnetic resonance imaging for defining tumor extent, and a fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-CT for detection of metastases. Radical tumor excision and resection of tumor involved regional lymph nodes are essential for a curative approach. Histopathological evaluation should involve determination of tumor differentiation grade, because high-grade carcinomas seem to have a much more aggressive behavior. Excision of distant metastases has no therapeutic value. Follow-up needs to be carried out in short intervals with frequent imaging.
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause a wide spectrum of immune-related adverse events, including encephalitis. To date, no prospective randomised controlled trials examining the patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes of ICI-associated encephalitis have been published. Therefore, we aimed to review case reports and to provide recommendations for the management of ICI-associated encephalitis. METHODS A literature search using Google Scholar and PubMed was performed in December 2019. Published case reports and case series of ICI-associated encephalitis were reviewed, and a case series from the Limmattal Hospital in Schlieren, Switzerland was added. The results are presented as numbers and medians (ranges). RESULTS Five different ICIs caused encephalitis in the 47 patients included in this case series. Nivolumab was the most frequently involved drug (27/47, 57%). The median time between treatment and onset of symptoms was 65 (4–630) days. Patients presented with rapidly evolving confusion, reduced level of consciousness, headache, seizures and focal neurological deficits. A total of 19 out of the 44 (43%) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans performed revealed findings suggestive of encephalitis. No specific electroencephalogram (EEG) pattern consistent with encephalitis was found, but epileptiform discharges were detected in 7/20 (35%) of all tested patients. Typical findings of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis were pleocytosis, elevated protein levels and normal glucose concentrations. Forty-four out of 47 (94%) patients received corticosteroids. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), rituximab and plasma exchange therapy were less frequently prescribed. Nine out of 47 (19%) patients died during the index hospitalisation. CONCLUSIONS Encephalitis should be suspected in patients treated with ICIs who present with rapidly evolving confusion. Blood tests, CSF analysis, cerebral MRI and an EEG should be performed. Therapy with intravenous corticosteroids is recommended. Steroid unresponsiveness is rare and should lead to a review of the diagnosis. Alternative treatment options are IVIG, plasma exchange therapy and rituximab.
PurposeThe study aimed to investigate strategies to prevent and treat cetuximab-induced skin reactions and their perceived effectiveness in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and recurrent/metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN).MethodsThis open-label, prospective observational study was conducted in Switzerland.ResultsA total of 125 patients were included (n = 91 mCRC, n = 34 SCCHN; mean age 63.3 years; 73.6% males). The frequency of acneiform rash grade ≥ 2 increased from 12.6% at week 2 to 21.7% at week 16. The proportion of patients who reported no skin reaction decreased from 75.6% at week 2 to 43.3% at week 16. The most frequently used skin products at any time of observation were moisturizing (77.6%), lipid-regenerating (56.8%) or urea-containing products (52%), systemic antibiotics (49.6%), and vitamin K1 cream (43.2%). There was no clear effectiveness pattern for all product classes: in given patients, either the product showed no effect at all or a moderate/strong effect, consistently over time.ConclusionsA great variety of low-cost general skin care products were commonly used. According to physician’s preference, systemic antibiotics and vitamin K1 cream are an appropriate approach to prevent or treat cetuximab-related skin toxicity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.