The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence and factors associated with paternity intention in 162 men with HIV/AIDS in Fortaleza, Ceará. Data were collected from June to September 2012 using a questionnaire in reference outpatient centers. Pearson's chi-squared test and logistic regression model were used for analysis. In all, 41.4% of men had the intention to have children. Age <35 years (p<0.001), desire to have children before diagnosis (p<0.001), relationship for less than five years (p=0.022), partner's desire to have children (p<0.001), having no children with the partner (p=0.047), partner without children (p=0.032) and therapy for more than three years (p=0.030) presented significant statistical association with men's desire to have children. In the multivariate analysis, the desire to have children before diagnosis (p=0.004; OR:9.81; CI:1.84-52.20) and partner's desire to have children (p<0.001; OR:9.72; CI:3.48-27.12) remained statistically significant. Many men still intend to be fathers even after the HIV/AIDS diagnosis.
Resumo: O objetivo do trabalho é investigar os fatores associados à violência por parceiro íntimo perpetrada após a revelação do diagnóstico de doenças sexualmente transmissíveis (DST), em Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil. Estudo transversal realizado com 221 pessoas atendidas em serviços de referência para DST. Realizou-se análise multivariada com modelo de regressão logística. Praticaram algum tipo de violência por parceiro íntimo após a revelação do diagnóstico 28,1% das pessoas. Praticar violência por parceiro íntimo apresentou associação com o uso de álcool (OR = 2,79; IC95%: 1,25-6,22; p = 0,012), o parceiro ter se relacionado com outra pessoa durante o relacionamento atual (OR = 4,71; IC95%: 2,24-9,91; p = 0,000), ter cometido violência anterior à DST (OR = 2,87; IC95%: 1,22-6,73; p = 0,015) e ter sofrido violência após o diagnóstico de DST (OR = 6,53; IC95%: 3,06-13,93; p = 0,000). A violência por parceiro íntimo após a revelação do diagnóstico de DST sinaliza que profissionais que atendem esta demanda devem identificar as dificuldades enfrentadas pelo paciente ao revelar o diagnóstico ao parceiro.
Aims and objectives:To compare polyurethane and silicone peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in newborns regarding the success rates of insertion and duration and the reasons for nonelective removal.Background: Previous studies have attempted to identify predictors of PICC complications in newborns, such as lower extremity insertion or femoral catheter insertion, procedures that require 60 minutes or more, duration longer than 30 days and noncentral position of the catheter tip. However, there is little evidence on which type of PICC material causes less complications, especially in newborns. Design:Retrospective cohort, guided by the STROBE tool. Methods:We divided the newborns into two groups according to the type of PICC material: polyurethane and silicone. Our sample was composed of 449 PICCs, of which 246 polyurethane PICCs and 203 silicone PICCs, inserted in 294 newborns. Bivariate analysis was performed for data comparison. All statistically significant variables in the bivariate analysis were included in the logistic regression (p ≤ .05). Results:Of the 449 PICCs that we analysed, the central position of the catheter tip predominated for both types of materials, with a higher prevalence of false passage for the polyurethane group. There was no difference between the average duration.The incidence of nonelective PICC removal was 49.27% for the silicone group, and infiltration/extravasation and rupture were among the reasons for nonelective removal. Conclusion:The overall success rates in the insertion and duration of the PICC were almost identical for both types of material, despite the high incidence of false passage for polyurethane PICCs. Nonelective removals were higher for silicone PICCs, which also had a higher incidence for infiltration/extravasation and rupture.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.