Background In the general population, mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are highly efficacious. Early reports suggest a diminished antibody response in immunosuppressed adult solid organ transplant (SOT) patients, but this has not been reported in pediatrics. Methods Adolescent kidney transplant recipients (KTR) at our center who received both doses of an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine had SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein antibody presence evaluated 4–8 weeks after their second dose of the vaccine as part of routine clinical care. Results Thirteen of 25 fully vaccinated patients (52%) had a positive spike antibody. Median age of participants was 19 years old (IQR 18–20) and the median time from transplant was 5 years (IQR 4–9 years). KTR were treated with an immunosuppression regimen including a calcineurin inhibitor, corticosteroid, and antimetabolite (9 with mycophenolate, 3 with azathioprine, and 1 without an antimetabolite due to viremia). Of those who had an antibody response, fewer had a mycophenolate-containing immunosuppressant regimen than non-responders. There was a trend toward better vaccine response and higher anti-S antibody titers at lower doses of mycophenolate. Three patients with prior COVID-19 infection all had a positive antibody response. Conclusion Our results suggest vaccine response in adolescent KRT is lower than that of the general population, but similar to that previously described in adult SOT patients and slightly better than that seen in adult KTR. This data demonstrates vaccination is safe and supports immunizing KTR who remain hesitant. Future studies should focus on better understanding of the cellular immune response to vaccination and strategies to enhance vaccine immunogenicity in pediatric SOT patients. Graphical abstract

Background Additional “booster” doses of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have become standard of care for immunosuppressed patients, including kidney transplant recipients (KTR). While these additional doses have been shown to be efficacious in the adult KTR population, there is paucity of data for pediatric and adolescent KTR. Methods We conducted a retrospective single-center observational study to determine the proportion of pediatric and adolescent KTR who seroconverted following two- and three-dose regimens of an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine series. Results Forty-three pediatric and adolescent KTR at our center received at least two doses of an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Seroconversion was noted in 56% of those who received a 2-dose series and increased to 85% in those who received a third dose. In the 16 patients who did not seroconvert after a two-dose series, 12 (75%) seroconverted following the third dose. No serious adverse effects of immunization were noted. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that additional SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses are not only safe and efficacious in pediatric and adolescent KTR, but may be necessary to optimize antibody response. Graphical Abstract A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00467-022-05661-8.

Background Infections are thought to be primarily responsible for triggering relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (NS). The COVID-19 pandemic promoted physical distancing, facial mask wearing, and greater attention to infection-prevention measures resulting in decreased transmission of infections. We hypothesized there would also be a decreased rate of NS relapse during this period. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of children with steroid-sensitive NS. Demographics, rate of relapses, and rate of hospitalizations were collected for a baseline pre-pandemic period (BPP) and for the social distancing period during the pandemic (SDP). Results One hundred twenty-two children with primary steroid-sensitive NS were identified and 109 were followed for the duration of the study period. The paired rate of relapse per subject per year was significantly lower during the SDP (0.6 relapses per subject per year ± 1 SD) compared to the BPP (1.0 relapses per subject per year ± 0.9 SD), P < 0.01. A subgroup of 32 subjects who were newly diagnosed with NS during the BPP similarly had significantly fewer relapses during the SDP (0.8 ± 1 SD) than during the BPP (1.4 ± 1 SD), P = 0.01. Conclusions Our results support the hypothesis of lower rates of NS relapse and hospitalizations during social distancing for all subjects in our cohort and a subgroup of those newly diagnosed. Lower relapse rates were likely attributable to decreased transmission of infections and greater attention to infection prevention.

No abstract

No abstract