This study was undertaken to examine the acute effect of interferential current on mechanical pain threshold and isometric peak torque after delayed onset muscle soreness induction in human hamstrings. Forty-one physically active healthy male volunteers aged 18-33 years were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups: interferential current group (n = 21) or placebo group (n = 20). Both groups performed a bout of 100 isokinetic eccentric maximal voluntary contractions (10 sets of 10 repetitions) at an angular velocity of 1.05 rad · s(-1) (60° · s(-1)) to induce muscle soreness. On the next day, volunteers received either an interferential current or a placebo application. Treatment was applied for 30 minutes (4 kHz frequency; 125 μs pulse duration; 80-150 Hz bursts). Mechanical pain threshold and isometric peak torque were measured at four different time intervals: prior to induction of muscle soreness, immediately following muscle soreness induction, on the next day after muscle soreness induction, and immediately after the interferential current and placebo application. Both groups showed a reduction in isometric torque (P < 0.001) and pain threshold (P < 0.001) after the eccentric exercise. After treatment, only the interferential current group showed a significant increase in pain threshold (P = 0.002) with no changes in isometric torque. The results indicate that interferential current was effective in increasing hamstrings mechanical pain threshold after eccentric exercise, with no effect on isometric peak torque after treatment.

O treinamento excêntrico (Texc) produz adaptações musculares que minimizam a ocorrência de lesões e é usado em reabilitação e treinamento de força, mas pouco se sabe sobre seus efeitos no equilíbrio entre músculos antagonistas do joelho. As razões de torque permitem determinar esses desequilíbrios musculares. O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar os efeitos de 12 semanas de Texc nas razões de torque excêntrico (Iexc:Qexc) entre os músculos isquiotibiais (I) e quadríceps (Q). Vinte e quatro sujeitos saudáveis do sexo masculino foram distribuídos nos grupos controle (GC, n=13, idade 27,7±4,6 anos) e experimental (GE, n=11, idade 28,5±9,5 anos), submetido ao treinamento. Um dinamômetro isocinético foi utilizado para o Texc (velocidade de -60 º/s) e para as avaliações (uma a cada quatro semanas). As razões de torque medidas foram comparadas estatisticamente entre os grupos e intragrupos entre as avaliações, com nível de significância de 5%. No GE, foi observada redução das razões de torque da avaliação (AV) inicial para as demais: AV1x AV2, p=0,005; AV1x AV3, p=0,001; e AV1x AV4, p<0,001. Na avaliação final, as razões do GE foram menores quando comparadas às do GC (p=0,041). O Texc altera pois o equilíbrio dos músculos flexores e extensores do joelho: doze semanas de Texc levam à redução da razão Iexc:Qexc e ao aumento do torque extensor, sem alteração significativa do torque flexor, podendo ser usado na reabilitação para fortalecimento dos músculos extensores do joelho.

Background: Previous studies have used orientation and translation of whole-vertebrae to describe three-dimensional cervical segmental kinematics. Describing kinematics using facet joint movement may be more relevant to pathology and effects of interventions but has not been investigated in the cervical spine. This study compared the reliability of two different methods (whole-vertebrae vs facet joint) to evaluate cervical kinematics. Methods: Two healthy adults each had six cervical (C1 to T1) magnetic resonance imaging scans, two each in neutral and left and right rotation. A semi-automated method of segmentation and alignment determined the relative orientation and translation of each whole-vertebrae and translation of each facet joint. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was determined using limits of agreement (LOA) with 95% confidence intervals and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,1 for intra-and ICC2,1 for inter-rater). Results: The LOA for intra-rater evaluation of facet movement was superior to whole vertebra translation. Both methods showed excellent intra-rater ICC3,1 (0.80 to 0.99) and inter-rater ICC2,1 (0.79 to 0.85) for all variables except for Euler angle for flexion/extension which was good (0.65). Intra-and inter-rater ICCs were better for facet movement than all measures of whole of vertebrae movement except Euler angles of axial rotation where no difference was detected. Conclusions: Measurement of three-dimensional segmental kinematics using either the facet joint or the whole-vertebrae method demonstrated excellent and comparable reliability. These findings support the use of the facet joint method as an option for describing and investigating cervical segmental kinematics.

No abstract

Introduction: Low levels of activation of the serratus anterior (SA) and lower trapezius (LT) muscles are associated with kinematics dysfunctions of the scapular belt, for which the focus of functional recovery is neuromuscular reeducation. Hence, the proposed exercises should keep muscular activation at levels between 20% and 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction. Objectives: To compare the activation of SA and LT muscles in different exercises by using surface electromyography. Methods: Five exercises (modified crucifix, scaption, modified military press, pull over and low row) were executed by ten healthy subjects. Results: The highest SA activation was found during scaption, and the adequate activation occurred in the modified military press. The highest LT activation was found during scaption and low row exercises. Conclusions: The exercises that kept the recommended range of activation for neuromuscular reeducation were the military press, for the SA muscle, and the low row and scaption, for the LT muscle.

Tropism, or asymmetry, of facet joints in the cervical spine has been found to be related to degenerative changes of the joints and discs. Clinicians often assume that differences in segmental mobility are related to tropism. The aims of this study were to determine the relationship between asymmetry of facet joints in the sub-axial cervical spine and (1) segmental mobility and (2) spinal levels perceived by therapists to have limited mobility. Eighteen participants with idiopathic neck pain had MRIs of their cervical spine in neutral and at the end of active rotation. Angular movement and translational movement of each motion segment was calculated from 3D segmentations of the vertebrae. A plane was fitted to the facet on each side. Tropism was considered to be the difference in the orientation of the facet planes and ranged from 1 to 30° with a median of 7.7°. No relationships were found between the extent of tropism and either segmental movement or locations deemed to be symptomatic. Tropism in the sub-axial cervical spine does not appear to be related to segmental mobility in rotation or to levels deemed to be symptomatic.

No abstract

No abstract