Unexplained disease etiology in hospitalized patients highlights the importance of surveillance to detect emerging novel pathogens.

BackgroundLymphatic Filariasis (LF) is an important Neglected Tropical Disease, being a major cause of disability worldwide. The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis aims to eliminate LF as a public health problem by the year 2020, primarily through repeated Mass Drug Administration (MDA). The Pacific region programme commenced in 1999. By June 2007, five of the eleven countries classified as endemic had completed five MDA campaigns and post-MDA prevalence surveys to assess their progress. We review available programme data and discuss their implications for other LF elimination programs in developing countries.MethodsReported MDA coverage and results from initial surveys and post-MDA surveys of LF using the immunochromatographic test (ICT) from these five Pacific Island countries (Tonga, Niue, Vanuatu, Samoa and Cook Islands) were analysed to provide an understanding of their quality and programme progress towards LF elimination. Denominator data reported by each country programme for 2001 was compared to official sources to assess the accuracy of MDA coverage data.ResultsInitial survey results from these five countries revealed an ICT prevalence of between 2.7 and 8.6 percent in individuals tested prior to commencement of the programme. Country MDA coverage results varied depending on the source of denominator data. Of the five countries in this case study, three countries (Tonga, Niue and Vanuatu) reached the target prevalence of <1% antigenaemia following five rounds of MDA. However, endpoint data could not be reliably compared to baseline data as survey methodology varied.ConclusionAccurate and representative baseline and post-campaign prevalence data is crucial for determining program effectiveness and the factors contributing to effectiveness. This is emphasised by the findings of this case study. While three of the five Pacific countries reported achieving the target prevalence of <1% antigenaemia, limitations in the data preclude identification of key determinants of this achievement.

No abstract

Medical school curricula are planned, written and organized by academic and clinical staff within medical schools. While these medical educators may well be experts in their given field, they lack first-hand experience of what it is to be a medical student in 1995. For a medical curriculum to be an effective means of learning for today's students, it must be written with a knowledge of their priorities, needs and abilities. The way in which this can be best achieved is by the inclusion of current students in all stages of designing a new curriculum. In my second year of medicine at Flinders University, I became involved in planning for the new Graduate Entry curriculum. In the role of student advocate, I have found I am able to offer teaching staff a unique perspective, the student perspective, on various issues. Students, through experience from their own education, are able to give advice on student resources and facilities and are in a favourable position to judge other aspects of curricula, such as the balance and relevance of course content and assessment. Students need to realize the valuable insight they have to offer their faculties and the way in which this can benefit future students. It is by actively seeking student involvement and using their input, that faculties will be able to create a consumer-friendly curriculum.