Many studies have shown a global efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for patients with endometriosis in reducing painful symptoms and improving quality of life (QoL) in the short and long-term. The aim of this study was to analyze the different trajectories of long-term evolution in QoL and symptoms following surgical treatment for endometriosis, and to identify corresponding patient profiles. This prospective and multicenter cohort study concerned 962 patients who underwent laparoscopic treatment for endometriosis. QoL was evaluated using the Short Form (SF)-36 questionnaire and intensity of pain was reported using a visual analog scale prior to surgery and at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after surgery. Distinctive trajectories of pain and QoL evolution were identified using group-based trajectory modeling, an approach which gathers individuals into meaningful subgroups with statistically similar trajectories. Pelvic symptom trajectories (models of the evolution of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and chronic pelvic pain intensity over years) correspond to (1) patients with no pain or pain no longer after surgery, (2) patients with the biggest improvement in pain and (3) patients with continued severe pain after surgery. Our study reveals clear trajectories for the progression of symptoms and QoL after surgery that correspond to clusters of patients. This information may serve to complete information obtained from epidemiological methods currently used in selecting patients eligible for surgery.
Objectives: Major clinical incidents can impact the healthcare professionals involved. This is of particular relevance in surgery, with the operating room being a high-risk zone for complications; however, there is few available data on how surgeons may be affected. The current study examined the impact of surgical complications on surgeon traumatic stress levels, emotional state, job performance, and coping strategies.Methods: A questionnaire to evaluate the impact of surgical complications on surgeon traumatic stress levels, emotional state, and job performance was developed by our team and communicated via an online link to gynecological surgeons.Results: A total of 72 gynecologic surgeons completed the questionnaire. Five percent had a Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) score of ≥15, revealing a high stress level, and 12% had an Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) score of ≥36, indicating acute traumatic stress. Our results show that following surgical incidents, surgeons receive support primarily from another surgical team member and that surgical practice may be impacted, leading in some cases to detrimental effects on patient care, notably reduced radicality in some surgical procedures. Conclusion:Surgeons may experience acute traumatic stress after serious surgical complications. Increased awareness of the negative consequences on surgeon emotional well-being is required, as well as improved access to support mechanisms.The study was approved by local ethics committee (IRB00013412, "CHU de Clermont Ferrand IRB #1," institutional review board number 2022-CF004).
We set out to identify factors of non-compliance with a protocol for the oral administration of misoprostol 25 µg (Angusta®) every 2 h (up to eight tablets), for the induction of labor (IOL). We conducted a retrospective study on IOL at term, on singleton pregnancies from 2019 to 2021, in a university hospital. The study included 195 patients, comprising 144 compliant protocols. Pain was statistically more frequent in the non-compliance group (92.2% vs. 62.5%, p < 0.001), and when a midwife was unavailable (15.7% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.001). A multivariable analysis found factors of good response (defined as going into labor before the administration of the median number of tablets, i.e., six) to be an indication for PROM (OR: 12.03, 95% CI: 5.42–26.71), and gestational age at induction (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.19–2.01), independently of BMI, initial Bishop score, and parity. Patients with pain who were able to follow the protocol delivered 9 h earlier than patients with pain who interrupted the protocol and 16 h earlier than patients who experienced no pain. We identified two key elements that favored compliance: (i) providing the next tablet in advance; and (ii) offering patients early epidural analgesia when in pain in order to continue the protocol and go into labor promptly.
Objective: Investigate the relationship between the structure of abdominal wall endometriotic nodules in MRI and their localisation in abdominal wall layers in order to better understand nodule origins. Design: Women who had an MRI prior to surgical treatment of an abdominal wall endometriotic nodule between 2005 and 2016. Population: Thirty-six patients including four patients with two nodules. Methods: MRI images were reviewed. Each nodule was analysed according to its structure (fibrous, cystic, mixed), localisation (subcutaneous fat, intra muscular, intermediary position), and size. Results: Forty nodules were analysed in MRI with no relationship found between localisation and nodule structure ( p = 0.48). 87.5% of mixed nodules were revealed to have a cystic superficial rim extending towards the subcutaneous fat layer. This finding suggests that the glandular part of the nodule is the active part of the disease from which nodule progression occurs. Intermediary and intramuscular nodules were respectively statistically larger than subcutaneous fat nodules indicating a relationship between nodule size and localisation (35 mm (22–53) vs 17 mm (17–23)) ( p = 0.03). Conclusion: Despite differences in environments surrounding the nodules, no significant relationship between nodule structure in imaging and abdominal wall localisation was found. Data from mixed nodules indicate however the possible role of nodule environment on structure and that the mechanism of nodule growth may be linked to development of cystic superficial rims, at the forefront of disease progression, abdominal wall nodules growing from deep to superficial. Studies are required to further investigate our findings and enable greater understanding of the origins of AWE.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.